"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1mf1i1hfnag1cm20nvq4f8hlekt2vkn2um@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 00:49:19 -0700, the following appeared in
> sci.skeptic, posted by "Glenn" <glennsheldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>
> >
> >"Dan Clore" <clore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:3oa81aF4r1f1U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> Columbia Journalism Review
> >> September/October 2005
> >> Undoing Darwin
> >> By Chris Mooney and Matthew C. Nisbet
> >>
> >> On March 14, 2005, The Wa****ngton Post's Peter Slevin wrote
> >> a front-page story on the battle that is "intensifying
> >> across the nation" over the teaching of evolution in
> >> public-school science cl*****. Slevin's lengthy piece took a
> >> detailed look at the lobbying, fund-raising, and
> >> communications tactics being deployed at the state and local
> >> level to undermine evolution. The article placed a
> >> particular emphasis on the burgeoning "intelligent design"
> >> movement, centered at Seattle's Discovery Institute, whose
> >> proponents claim that living things, in all their organized
> >> complexity, simply could not have arisen from a mindless and
> >> directionless process such as the one so famously described
> >> in 1859 by Charles Darwin in his classic, The Origin of Species.
>
> >Strike three.
>
> Is this supposed to mean something?
> --
>
Perhaps,
Strike 1 - Bible readings in public schools unconstitutional
http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/2/
Strike 2 - Creation Science in public schools unconstitutional
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/edwards-v-aguillard.html
Strike 3 - ID in public schools unconstitutional (pending in Dover).
|
