Human Events has an article by Phyllis Schlafly here: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16499 I have responded to them as follows: Phyllis Schlafley makes a strikingly false claim in this article. She says that "Despite bitter denunciations by liberals, funny thing, there has been a thundering silence about the one-third of her book in which she deconstructs Darwinism." In actual fact, the responses to Coulter's book have included several in-depth refutations of Coulter's attempt to disprove (not deconstruct) Darwinian evolution. These include: http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070010 http://mediamatters.org/items/200607240008 http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/06/anne_coulter_cl_1.html http://www.talkreason.org/articles/coulter1.cfm http://www.talkreason.org/articles/coulter2.cfm http://www.talkreason.org/articles/coulter3.cfm http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/06/ann_coulter_no_evidence_for_ev.php http://www.talkreason.org/articles/coultergeist.cfm http://www.countercurrents.org/goff100706.htm http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesignwatch/tautology.html http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070002 (You will note that Schlafly's article was posted on August 14, 2006, a month or longer after many of these rebuttals. Schlafly would have learned of the falsehood of her claim with a simple Google search.) Ann Coulter's claims about evolution have been definitively debunked. ****** I would appreciate any more links to good debunkings that readers may have. -- Dan Clore My collected fiction, _The Unspeakable and Others_: http://amazon.com/o/ASIN/1587154838/ref=nosim/thedanclorenecro Lord We˙rdgliffe & Necronomicon Page: http://www.geocities.com/clorebeast/ News & Views for Anarchists & Activists: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo Strange pleasures are known to him who flaunts the immarcescible purple of poetry before the color-blind. -- Clark Ashton Smith, "Epigrams and Apothegms"
