Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?

"User" <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:IrnXh.5242$dd.4391@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> seon ferguson wrote:
>> "User" <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:zA1Xh.5111$dd.1377@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Useful Info wrote:
>>>> See how the USA is becoming a police state:
>>>>
>>>> http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
>>>>
>>>> 9/11 was perpetrated by criminal elements in the US government.
>>>>
>>>> http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/911.html
>>>
>>> 911 happened just like the trolls on this group say and no matter
>>> how many unanswered questions you have you are a kook if you do not
>>> slide that hat around and join the gang. Don't let that bright light
>>> concern you because there is no proof it is anything that anyone
>>> should care about.
>> Oh I guess I'd be a troll for believing in what I saw on TV. Yep my
>> eyes decieved me there were really bombs in the buidings or is it
>> mini nukes? and the pentagon was really hit by a missle even though
>> witnesses said it was flight 77.
>
> You are a Kook if you do not agree with the resident trolls. The ones
that 
> cry Kook as soon as they spot a new poster. They the flies that eat each

> others **** all day.
>
> You do however seem a bit confused. You state that you believe in what
you 
> saw on TV but you accept what others have seen and you have not. There
are 
> plenty of people that are not convinced about many things. They are not 
> willing to surrender because they don't let others tell them what they 
> should believe. I can live with someone else's idea of what is proof to 
> them but I would always wonder. Non-thinkers get confused when they are 
> confronted with to much to process. They rather surrender and move on.
>
> These same people are willing to accept the idea that certain
information 
> can not be released until some time in the future. This is standard 
> procedure with the government. People are always learning all the facts 
> when it is too late to do anything about it.
>
> You might not agree that this is going an and many will cry Kook.
>
>

I accept what others have said because there are a countless number of 
witnesses to flight 77 cra****ng into the pentagon. If no one said anything
I 
would be suspicious. Now what I am open to is what happened before 911 to 
allow it to happen because I didn't see many of the instances on TV so
there 
open to debate. As well as what happened after ie Bush allowing the Bin 
laden family to fly out without questioning them, using 911 as an excuse
to 
introduce his un American patriot act and rip the constitution to shreds
etc

Going back to what you said about believing what others said, how do you 
know the planes were remotely controlled? You weren't there. How do you
know 
the CIA carried it out? Were *you* there?