Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Paranet Skeptic > Re: If it's "ju...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 24 Topic 196 of 215
Post > Topic >>

Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?

by "User" <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 25, 2007 at 12:28 AM

seon ferguson wrote:
> "User" <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:TyxXh.5304$dd.4512@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> seon ferguson wrote:
>>> "User" <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:IrnXh.5242$dd.4391@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> seon ferguson wrote:
>>>>> "User" <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:zA1Xh.5111$dd.1377@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Useful Info wrote:
>>>>>>> See how the USA is becoming a police state:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 9/11 was perpetrated by criminal elements in the US government.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/911.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 911 happened just like the trolls on this group say and no matter
>>>>>> how many unanswered questions you have you are a kook if you do
>>>>>> not slide that hat around and join the gang. Don't let that
>>>>>> bright light concern you because there is no proof it is
>>>>>> anything that anyone should care about.
>>>>> Oh I guess I'd be a troll for believing in what I saw on TV. Yep
>>>>> my eyes decieved me there were really bombs in the buidings or is
>>>>> it mini nukes? and the pentagon was really hit by a missle even
>>>>> though witnesses said it was flight 77.
>>>>
>>>> You are a Kook if you do not agree with the resident trolls. The
>>>> ones that cry Kook as soon as they spot a new poster. They the
>>>> flies that eat each others **** all day.
>>>>
>>>> You do however seem a bit confused. You state that you believe in
>>>> what you saw on TV but you accept what others have seen and you
>>>> have not. There are plenty of people that are not convinced about
>>>> many things. They are not willing to surrender because they don't
>>>> let others tell them what they should believe. I can live with
>>>> someone else's idea of what is proof to them but I would always
>>>> wonder. Non-thinkers get confused when they are confronted with to
>>>> much to process. They rather surrender and move on. These same
>>>> people are willing to accept the idea that certain
>>>> information can not be released until some time in the future. This
>>>> is standard procedure with the government. People are always
>>>> learning all the facts when it is too late to do anything about it.
>>>>
>>>> You might not agree that this is going an and many will cry Kook.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I accept what others have said because there are a countless number
>>> of witnesses to flight 77 cra****ng into the pentagon. If no one said
>>> anything I would be suspicious. Now what I am open to is what
>>> happened before 911 to allow it to happen because I didn't see many
>>> of the instances on TV so there open to debate. As well as what
>>> happened after ie Bush allowing the Bin laden family to fly out
>>> without questioning them, using 911 as an excuse to introduce his un
>>> American patriot act and rip the constitution to shreds etc
>>> Going back to what you said about believing what others said, how do
>>> you know the planes were remotely controlled? You weren't there. How
>>> do you know the CIA carried it out? Were *you* there?
>>
>>  I am not sure what you ask. I have never thought planes were
>> remotely controlled.  I don't even have suspicions of any events. I
>> don't believe anything that I am told on usenet. I am not affiliated
>> with any group or share any opinions with anyone. I was not there
>> and have never posted anything that anyone might have issues with. I
>> have always asked questions.
>>
>> Maybe you have me confused with someone else. I have a hard time
>> sorting out posts after they have been snipped and butchered myself.
>> I will give you the op****tunity to repost if you care to.
>>
>>
> I'm confusing you with other people who believe that. Good you
> shouldn't believe anything you're told without investigating it but
> the proof that flight 77, 93 and the other planes were hijacked and
> used as weapons and most of the so called "official story" is on TV.
> Or was...

 I am looking forward to learing more about that TV news.

Bill Moyers has put together a 90-minute video do***enting
the lies that the Bush administration told to sell the Iraq war to the
American public, with a special focus on how the media led the charge.

 Watch PBS from 9:00 to 10:30 PM on Wednesday, April 25. Spending that 90 
minutes will actually save you time because you'll never watch television 
news again - not even on PBS, which comes in for its own share of
criticism.
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-23 08:25:22 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-24 21:04:11 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-24 09:17:47 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-25 10:15:36 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-24 20:48:07 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-25 13:40:08 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 00:28:09 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-25 16:55:59 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 06:34:49 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-26 10:00:56 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-26 07:08:23 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-28 12:57:31 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2007-04-30 02:48:17 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-25 10:47:41 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 11:19:59 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-25 11:45:05 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"Deputy Dumbya Dawg&  2007-04-25 15:56:20 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 12:55:27 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-25 14:42:33 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 12:47:23 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"Deputy Dumbya Dawg&  2007-04-25 15:33:51 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
BDK <BDK@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-04-25 14:53:08 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2007-04-26 04:48:21 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-26 07:40:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 8:17:40 CDT 2008.