Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Paranet Skeptic > Re: If it's "ju...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 24 Topic 196 of 215
Post > Topic >>

Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?

by adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Al Dykes) Apr 25, 2007 at 11:45 AM

In article <fkKXh.5345$dd.3540@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
User <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Al Dykes wrote:
>> In article <IrnXh.5242$dd.4391@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> User <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> seon ferguson wrote:
>>>> "User" <user22135@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:zA1Xh.5111$dd.1377@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Useful Info wrote:
>>>>>> See how the USA is becoming a police state:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 9/11 was perpetrated by criminal elements in the US government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/911.html
>>>>>
>>>>> 911 happened just like the trolls on this group say and no matter
>>>>> how many unanswered questions you have you are a kook if you do not
>>>>> slide that hat around and join the gang. Don't let that bright
>>>>> light concern you because there is no proof it is anything that
>>>>> anyone should care about.
>>>> Oh I guess I'd be a troll for believing in what I saw on TV. Yep my
>>>> eyes decieved me there were really bombs in the buidings or is it
>>>> mini nukes? and the pentagon was really hit by a missle even though
>>>> witnesses said it was flight 77.
>>>
>>> You are a Kook if you do not agree with the resident trolls. The
>>> ones that cry Kook as soon as they spot a new poster. They the flies
>>> that eat each others **** all day.
>>>
>>> You do however seem a bit confused. You state that you believe in
>>> what you saw on TV but you accept what others have seen and you have
>>> not. There are plenty of people that are not convinced about many
>>> things. They are not
>>
>>
>> But those people are not eye witnesses to the evemts of 9/11.  A
>> million or so people were eye witnesses to some aspect of the WTC and
>> Pentagon events and they also same-day TV coverage and the news
>> coverage afterwords.
>>
>> I don't see any "eye witnesses for truth" movement.
>>
>> I don't see any NY Firemen for truth" movement. They, of all people,
>> know about building collapses and fires.  They also lost 340(?)  of
>> their friends and have every reason to find the reasons for the
>> disaster.
>
>No one knows about building collapses of that magnitude. Reasons to not
want 
>to know the truth does not mean you would be successful if you tried.
>
>>
>> It seems that all these people have no problem with the standard story
>> of 9/11.
>
>  Points taken. There are many "whys" and "why nots" . The main thing
that 
>is troublesome is the fight to prevent investigations. Everyone has a
very 
>well earned level of distrust of Bush. 
>


Don't conflate problems with the process of the 9/11 commission with
the idea that *anybody* with first-hand experience with 9/11 or with
relevant expertise thinks that anything but the standard story is
correct; Islamists hijacked 4 commercial jets and those jets were the
entire cause of all the disasters of 9/11.

Nobody. 








-- 
a d y k e s @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 p a n i x . c o m 
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-23 08:25:22 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-24 21:04:11 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-24 09:17:47 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-25 10:15:36 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-24 20:48:07 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-25 13:40:08 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 00:28:09 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-25 16:55:59 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 06:34:49 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-26 10:00:56 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-26 07:08:23 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"seon ferguson"  2007-04-28 12:57:31 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2007-04-30 02:48:17 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-25 10:47:41 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 11:19:59 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-25 11:45:05 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"Deputy Dumbya Dawg&  2007-04-25 15:56:20 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 12:55:27 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-25 14:42:33 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"User" <user  2007-04-25 12:47:23 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"Deputy Dumbya Dawg&  2007-04-25 15:33:51 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
BDK <BDK@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-04-25 14:53:08 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2007-04-26 04:48:21 
Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?
adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-04-26 07:40:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Aug 20 23:30:39 CDT 2008.