Re: If it's "just a conspiracy", then why so much evidence?

Deputy Dumbya Dawg wrote:
> "Al Dykes" <adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:f0nt21$gj9$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> Don't conflate problems with the process of the 9/11
>> commission with
>> the idea that *anybody* with first-hand experience with 9/11
>> or with
>> relevant expertise thinks that anything but the standard
>> story is
>> correct; Islamists hijacked 4 commercial jets and those jets
>> were the
>> entire cause of all the disasters of 9/11.
>>
>> Nobody.
>
>
> Dykes you are such a lying little ****.
>
> http://brightpathvideo.com:80/
>
>
>
> Architect, Richard Gage explores the flawed conclusions of the
> 911
> Commission re****t and the conclusions of NIST, in this new
> presentation
> on evidence sup****ting controlled demolition for World Trade
> 1, 2 and 7.
>
> Watch his presentation http://brightpathvideo.com/

Who do think will actually view this besides a few of us.

 Once you  think you know everything I don't really see anyone  willing to

look further to prove themselves wrong. This is at the heart of what
upsets 
the dead end group. There is utterly nothing that will get these guy to
view 
a cite or a video no matter what. They have posted so many times they are 
not capable of even the idea that they could have one issue out of sync.