On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:21:00 -0800, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Jorge
<jorge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:49:40 -0800 (PST), Harry K
<turnkey4099@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>>On Feb 13, 7:55 am, wf3h <w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Feb 13, 8:52 am, Jeffrey Turner <jtur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> > Dan Clore wrote:
>>> > > The only interesting thing about the "theory of intelligent
design" is
>>> > > that it itself betrays no evidence of intelligent design.
>>> > But it does keep evolving under legal environmental pressures. I
wonder
>>> > what that means.
>>> lawyers are more intelligent than creationists?
>>I think there is an insult in there somewhere but I can't figure out
>>which side is one being insulted ;)
>At least lawyers made it past the 3rd grade?
So did most creationists. Frightening, isn't it?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
