Harry K <turnkey4099@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 7:55 am, wf3h <w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Feb 13, 8:52 am, Jeffrey Turner <jtur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > Dan Clore wrote:
> >
> > > > The only interesting thing about the "theory of intelligent
design" is
> > > > that it itself betrays no evidence of intelligent design.
> >
> > > But it does keep evolving under legal environmental pressures. I
wonder
> > > what that means.
> >
> > lawyers are more intelligent than creationists?
>
> I think there is an insult in there somewhere but I can't figure out
> which side is one being insulted ;)
>
Creationists, if they are lower than s*** sucking bottom feeders.
[Sorry John Pieret. I just *have* to insult lawyers...]
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
|
