Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History

Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA wrote:
> Casanobrain; There you go again, and it is a very tired and old song
> from the debunker camp, which is why 99.99% of the debunkers have
> given up and quit.  I did predict many times that when the UFO cover-
> up had officially ended, all that would be left are those idiots that
> are so mentally challenged, that no amount of proof would convince
> them.  Luckily for us, you are the only stooge that is left.  For
> that, you do deserve pity, but nothing more.    Luckily for you, you
> will never be shown any evidence for many reasons #1) You are too
> immature and do not demonstrate that you have even a simplistic
> understanding of science and #2) You have never explained what you
> have examined, which means you have analyzed nothing, which I guess
> sums up your entire argument: nothing!  On second thought, pity would
> be too good for you!!
> 
> Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:23:24 -0700 (PDT), the following
>> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB
>> Wholeflaffers ASA <science@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>
>>> Casanobrain,  No matter how much you huff and puff, you cannot blow
>>> the House of UFO Evidence down, there is just way too much evidence
>>> now.
>> You seem to be the one huffing and puffing; all I'm doing is
>> asking for that "way too much evidence", which you seem
>> unable to produce. Why is that, I wonder? And do the lurkers
>> sup****t you in email?
>>
>>>  Sorry if the evidence is a little above your primitive knowledge
>>> of how reality works.
>> Reality works via imaginary evidence?
>>
>>>  The "burden of dis-proof" has now been kicked
>>> back to the debunker camp, and as of April 2008, no debunker has
>>> disproved the reality of the extraterrestrial presence on Earth.
>> No one has disproved the existence of the Invisible Pink
>> Unicorn either. You seem confused regarding the burden of
>> proof. But then, you seem confused in general.
>>
>>> Debunkers are now considered in the general society as worthless
>>> individuals, mad-hatters and demented screamers.  Sadly Bob, you fall
>>> into all three groups.
>> That's a relief. If your imaginary friends ("the general
>> society") consider me to be in those categories it means I
>> must be on the right track.
>>
>> Where's that evidence again?
>>
>>>   If you and Hagor decided to leave these
>>> groups, I guess all that would be left is NSA-Borsch, and truly, his
>>> heart isn't into it anymore, he has through back channels, given up.
>>> Isn't it amazing that from over 50 debunkers, we are down to 1 NSA-
>>> chump (Borsch), 1 12-year old bed-wetter (Hagor) and a "if I see no
>>> evidence there isn't any" repeater, which is  you Bob.  How low the
>>> debunkers have fallen.  But I DID predict this would happen after the
>>> UFO cover-up officially ended, which it has!
>> You predicted you would be asked for your imaginary
>> evidence, and that you wouldn't be able to produce it? Well,
>> OK...but that's not anything new, since the UFO True
>> Believers have been there for years, and there's still no
>> evidence to be seen.
>>
>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>> You seem strangely euphoric over the fact that your
>>>> "evidence" is as imaginary as your "scientific
>>>> qualifications" and "security clearance". And the giggling
>>>> is interesting. Perhaps you should decrease your consumer
>>>> sup****t for the drug cartels, at least long enough to come
>>>> within hailing range of reality.
>> Gonna take this advice, or continue to huff and puff?
>> --
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>>                           - McNameless

He is still alive! Damn