Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Paranet UFO > Re: Can we all ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 98 Topic 2414 of 2578
Post > Topic >>

Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for

by FalseFlagUSA <science@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 13, 2008 at 11:11 PM

On Jun 12, 9:04 am, UseNetO...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:26:03 -0700 (PDT), Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers
>
> ASA <scie...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >WE MUST NOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN.
>
> Will they ask us?
>
> > I have notified General Borman Killemall
>
> Borman is a good friend of mine ... since those early school days!

Excellent, give him my best.

Can ALL MANKIND finally agree to eliminate the greatest TERROR-THREAT
on THIS PLANET EARTH once and for all?? Of course I am talking about
the scourge of debunkers (and their ilk!).  This cancerous blight has
taken an enormous toll on the human population and it is way past time
to repel and destroy the most evil of evil and hated of hated.  Once
the debunkers are finally eradicated from this world, the entire globe
will be thrust into a BRAVE NEW WORLD of peace, liberty and justice
for all.  AMEN!!

UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of
UFO Debunking!

     The standing joke among UFO circles is for every 200 UFO
sightings, the Air Force can explain away 201.  The possibility that
our Government might withhold or distort information about UFOs might
seem farfetched, until you read the mountains of evidence compiled
from the Government's own files.  Evidence that strongly suggests a
cover-up.  The U.S. Military first started seeing UFOs in World War
II, pilots called them "Foo Fighters."  We thought they were a German
secret weapon, the German's thought they were ours.  An explosion of
civilian sightings in 1947 caught the military by surprise.  Top
secret investigations were begun.  A joint study by the FBI and Army
concluded, "The flying saucer situation is not all imaginary,
something is really flying around."  That re****t was kept secret until
1976.

     Most early UFO sightings were made by eyewitnesses and not
radar.  In New Mexico, over a two year period, dozens of people
re****ted seeing green fire-balls over sensitive military
installations.  But when radar and cameras were dispatched to those
installations, the fire-balls mysteriously ****fted someplace else.  A
1949 study by scientists at Los Alamos Lab stated, "The fireballs
deserve serious consideration.".

     Some have suggested that the saucer craze of the 1940's and
1950's was a by-product of Cold War tensions and fears.  Both the U.S.
and the U.S.S.R. conducted secret studies to find out if the other
side was behind the UFOs, and both concluded early on that the
capabilities of the flying discs seemed beyond human technology.  This
secret re****t done in 1948 by the Air Force and Naval Intelligence is
among the most fascinating of the UFO do***ents ever to surface
because it wasn't suppose to exist.  A confidential memo at the end of
the re****t ordered that all copies should be destroyed.  But one copy
survived and was finally pried out of the Pentagon in 1985.  It's a
study of more than 200 of the earliest UFO sightings, including one
that occurred on June, 1947, near Lake Mead. The re****t notes that an
Air Force pilot saw a formation of six UFOs, and the UFOs were some
type of flying craft, not weather balloons or hallucinations.  The
re****t made note of the fact that more than a few sighting re****ts
were made by experienced personnel, and that the origin of flying
saucers was not ascertainable.

The Cold War with the Soviets and Communist countries was heating up.
Strange craft were re****ted all over our skies, and the news media was
critical of government's explanations. Many people thought the craft
belonged to the Soviet Union or perhaps aliens bent on invasion. There
was fear the Soviets could use UFO propaganda to discredit the US
government. There was genuine concern that a national panic could
occur. Whether UFOs were real or not, the situation made the president
nervous and made the military and the various intelligence agencies
look bad. Plenty of good re****ts were trickling out that a substantial
number of military aircraft were cra****ng. Stories started to leak out
that these aircraft were cra****ng while chasing UFOs. The crashes were
explained as training accidents and mechanical failures, but the news
media was starting to tie the two types of re****ts together.

     The over-all effort to study saucers was called "Project Sign,"
and the headquarters was located at Wright Field in Ohio.  In 1949,
Sign personnel wrote a top-secret re****t, which concluded that, "UFOs
were extra-terrestrial craft."  When the re****t made it to the desk of
the Chief of Staff General Hoyt Vandeberg, he rejected it and ordered
all copies burned.  This rejection from the top was in the view of
many, the death knell for any objective study of UFOs.  A few weeks
later Project Sign produced another final re****t stating that it's
findings were "inconclusive."  That re****t was accepted and soon after
Project Sign became Project Grudge.  Grudge evaluated re****ts on the
premise that UFOs could not exist.  According to a later re****t by the
Library of Congress, it was the job of Grudge to explain them all.
Despite this slant, 23% of Grudge cases remained a mystery.  Grudge
staffers decided these cases were physiologically motivated, the first
official declaration that people who see UFOs are crazy.

In 1952, there were more sightings than the five previous years
combined, including the two infamous Wa****ngton D.C. incidents.  Yet
another study was launched, Project Bluebook.  Bluebook today is
notorious in UFO circles as a whitewash.  There is considerable
evidence the project was far from objective.  The man appointed to
head Bluebook, Captain Edward Ruppelt, said he was told in the very
beginning that the 'powers that be' were anti-flying-saucer and to
stay in favor, "it behooves one to follow suit."  Ruppelt later
resigned from the military and wrote a book about what he says was the
Bluebook cover-up and the reality of flying saucers.  The continued
increase of UFO sightings was a source of great concern for the CIA
and a new strategy was born: "UFO DEBUNKING."

A group of CIA-connected scientists was assembled in secret to
evaluate UFOs. CIA do***ents reveal that five members of the
Scientific Advisory Panel, who were all well-known skeptics, were
given several poor UFO cases to examine and came to the conclusion
that "there was no evidence of a direct threat to national security in
the objects sighted. Flying saucer re****ts were overloading emergency
re****ting channels with false information, clogging up communication
lines, causing alarm, and realistically even if they were real there
was little we could do about them."  Furthermore, the government was
losing the confidence of the people. Our science and aircraft seemed
to be confronted by far superior technology.

The  "Robertson Panel" spent all of twelve hours in a round-table
discussion, analyzing only about a handful of UFO cases.  The Panel
concluded that, "UFOs are not a threat to national security...but
continued re****ting of UFOs is a threat."  Their recommendation: The
Government should take immediate steps to strip UFOs of their "aura of
mystery," through a program of public education.  The final re****t
even used the term, "DEBUNKING."

The Robertson Panel discussions and recommendations centered around
the main problem of eradicating belief in these unidentified flying
objects. Ways of using the news media and movies to discredit UFOs
were discussed and placed into action.  This resulted in the reduction
of public interest around the reality of flying saucers, which even
today still evokes a strong psychological reaction. Such propaganda
techniques included addressing actual UFO cases, which might have been
puzzling at first but later explained away as natural phenomenon.

The panel also discussed various insidious methods that were often
implemented to execute this debunking program.  It was felt strongly
that psychologists familiar with mass psychology should be called in
as advisers to assist with the nature and extent of this program.
These national programs resulted in the National Policy.  The end
result was to debunk any valid sighting, even if it resulted in the
embarrassment of pilots and/or government employees. UFO re****ts were
denied, debunked and those who saw them were soundly and mercilessly
ridiculed.

Timothy Good in his book Above Top Secret writes: Another sinister
recommendation of the panel was that civilian UFO groups should be
watched "because of their potentially great influence on mass thinking
if widespread sightings should occur. The apparent irresponsibility
and the possible use of such groups for subversive purposes should be
kept in mind." The panel concluded that "the continued emphasis on the
re****ting these phenomena does, in these parlous times, result in a
threat to the orderly functioning of the protective organs of the body
politic," and recommended:

a. That the national security agencies take immediate steps to strip
the Unidentified Flying Objects of the special status they have been
given and the aura of mystery they have unfortunately acquired.

b. That the national security agencies institute policies on
intelligence, training, and public education designed to prepare the
material defenses and the morale of the country to recognize most
promptly and to react most effectively to true indications of hostile
intent or action.

Shortly thereafter every effort of the government went into debunking
UFOs even if it would mean embarrassing its own people. It soon became
known the best way to destroy your military career was to re****t a
UFO. Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, Chief of the Aerial Phenomena Branch
at the Air Technical Intelligence Center, said that the CIA ordered
the Air Force to debunk sightings and debunk witnesses.   "We're
ordered to hide sightings when possible," he told Major Keyhole, "but
if a strong re****t does get out we have to publish a fast
explanation--
make up something to kill the re****t in a hurry, and also ridicule the
witness, especially if we can't figure out a plausible answer, even if
we have to discredit our own pilots."
C
 




 98 Posts in Topic:
Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all/His
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-10 21:45:01 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-10 22:53:11 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-11 03:16:41 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-11 03:46:45 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-11 07:21:42 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-12 08:26:03 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-12 18:04:43 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
"Hagar" <hag  2008-06-12 12:00:20 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-11 04:35:04 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-11 21:43:38 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-12 01:02:14 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
FalseFlagUSA <science@  2008-06-13 23:11:51 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-14 08:41:45 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
"Timelord" <  2008-06-14 23:49:25 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-17 00:52:37 
The Plastic Hydrogen Bomb Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-17 07:18:35 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
"Timelord" <  2008-06-19 12:18:54 
Re: Human Extinction: Why ETs Are Here Re: Can we all agree to
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-20 04:49:24 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-23 19:19:42 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-23 22:31:16 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-24 16:37:01 
Extraterrestrial Saucer At Groom Lake Re: Can we all agree to e
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-23 22:32:43 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-23 22:39:48 
Where The Rubber Hits The Road (pardon the pun, RVers) Re: Can
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-23 22:44:11 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-24 16:03:58 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-25 14:39:13 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-06-25 12:38:16 
Re: The Male Mind In 50 Words Or Less Re: Can we all agree to
"Episkopos J.J. Jubi  2008-06-28 06:01:59 
Re: The Male Mind In 50 Words Or Less Re: Can we all agree to
"Episkopos J.J. Jubi  2008-06-28 06:02:56 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-19 17:52:15 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
"Timelord" <  2008-06-19 23:57:43 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-20 09:36:22 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-20 04:32:57 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-28 09:11:39 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-06-28 11:44:30 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
"Hagar" <hag  2008-06-30 12:22:51 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-06-30 14:28:23 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
Sir Gilligan Horry <GM  2008-07-04 16:10:51 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-07-04 19:46:44 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur <science@[E  2008-07-16 05:26:30 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-07-06 21:46:52 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-07-07 17:34:42 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
"Episkopos J.J. Jubi  2008-06-28 10:43:42 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-07-03 23:43:01 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-19 18:38:58 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
"Timelord" <  2008-06-20 00:04:20 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-20 01:58:50 
The Plastic Hydrogen Bomb Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-20 07:07:19 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-21 00:14:39 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-06-20 17:05:13 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-28 22:21:46 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-06-29 17:19:06 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-20 02:49:25 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-21 00:19:58 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-20 03:31:10 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-20 06:37:45 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-21 00:15:39 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-20 03:55:04 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-20 07:02:43 
Human Extinction: Why ETs Are Here Re: Can we all agree to eli
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-20 07:09:06 
Re: Human Extinction: Why ETs Are Here Re: Can we all agree to
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-20 07:12:01 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
"Timelord" <  2008-06-20 10:53:46 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-20 23:20:19 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-20 08:24:47 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-21 22:23:45 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-06-22 12:08:14 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-23 17:56:10 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-23 21:36:12 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-24 16:35:28 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-24 04:44:08 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
"H." <hbosch  2008-06-26 08:14:11 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-26 19:54:49 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-06-26 15:31:05 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-07-05 04:50:02 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-07-05 15:13:46 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-07-05 04:52:25 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-07-05 15:15:07 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-07-03 23:46:37 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-07-04 19:44:19 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-07-03 23:48:37 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-25 22:48:11 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-26 07:03:19 
The Male Mind In 50 Words Or Less Re: Can we all agree to elimi
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-26 08:05:42 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-06-27 06:11:57 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-06-27 15:16:43 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffe  2008-07-06 00:22:08 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
Bob Casanova <nospam@[  2008-07-06 14:18:56 
Re: The Male Mind In 50 Words Or Less Re: Can we all agree to
"Malik J.J. Jubilee&  2008-06-28 03:24:17 
Re: The Male Mind In 50 Words Or Less Re: Can we all agree to e
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-28 07:03:55 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Gilligan Horry <Si  2008-06-11 22:29:05 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-12 01:38:08 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-12 09:22:16 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-12 06:45:17 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-12 14:33:24 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
www.freedomtofascism.com   2008-06-12 18:52:20 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
UseNetOnly@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-13 01:37:04 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for al
"Hagar" <hsa  2008-06-12 18:06:15 
Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for
Sir Arthur <science@[E  2008-07-20 03:33:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 3:00:05 CST 2008.