Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all/History of debunking

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:56:10 -0700 (PDT), Sir Gilligan Horry
<Sir.Gilligan.Horry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>The Timelord was asking me if I sup****t full-disclosure.
>Well, if there was full-disclosure it would spoil the fun.
>I've had so much fun in alien and UFO newsgroups over the years.
> (well, ups and downs, but it has been awesome)
>
What is there to "disclose"?

>Even in the DVD called "What The Bleep"
>that good professor says "don't be in the know, be in the mystery".
>
The greatest mystery of man is he to himself.

>However, full-disclosure has happened within a variety of agencies.
>
Obvious.

>And if me and you and them agencies can't deal with all the facts.
>Then there is no-way a potato farmer or a book binder or a house
>builder can deal with all the disclosure and facts. Unless they want
>to get into it all. Via freedom of choice and degree of im****tance.
>
Secrecy is an obstacle in communication, it serves nobody.

>The fact is, many people have seen and studied the Mothman DVD, and
>all the Human Wars, and other do***entaries, ... and we just get on
>with life and better ideas.
>
Well, ... I never studied the "Mothman" ..

>I feel there is a good future here and out there for our humanity.
>
>And it's the same old story,
>we just have to make sure there are not too many
>rotten idiot bad minds in control.
>
Who cares? (except Alexa)

>It's the same in Zimbabwe.
>I see many 'paid off' or 'afraid' people sup****ting the wrong
>president.
>
Yup, it's their own quest ...

>I'm glad Russia and China are not going to intervene. (I know, for
>several reasons)
>
No oil ...

>Because those people in Zimbabwe have to sort it out.
>They each have to work out something in their mind.
>
Correct.

>It's the best way a brain develops.
>
Is it?
>
>We have done it in Newsgroups, the Wars, in Hollywood, and in
>Do***entaries.
>
Viva el presidente de los Americanos de norte :-)
C.