Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for

On Jul 6, 2:18 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 00:22:08 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB
> Wholeflaffers ASA <scie...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 04:52:25 -0700 (PDT), the following
>
> >> Inability to understand the post to which you thought you
> >> were responding, noted.
>
> >To Casanobrain:
>
> >Inability to debunk any facts
>
> Confirmation of inability to understand English noted.
>
Confirmation that Casanobrain is a worthless human being and a
pathetic debunker, but so aren't they all?

The spOOks-Kooks-Trolls (SKT) methods are easy to decipher, they use
them repeatedly:

* They never address the good evidence in regards to the ET reality.
They will never in any meaningful way discuss the good scientific work
done on animal mutilations; crop circles and pictographs, alien
abductions; trace cases-where the craft lands and leaves; recovered
down craft; back engineering of alien craft; surgically removed alien
implants, outstanding videos from NASA, etc.

* The SKT's will not argue the evidence, they will attack the person
presenting the evidence. This is their top technique, make the poster
the center-of-attention, and then follow up each other's post with
more nonsense.  The Usenet Debunkers are like a pack of hungry wolfs,
the first one makes a snide remark about the poster and the others
follow suit.  Flame wars galore. DO NOT LET THIS TECHNIQUE FOOL YOU,
there is real good information on these newsgroups!

Other distingui****ng features of the spOOks-KooKs-Trolls:

*Make comments unrelated to do with the subject matter.
*Have closed minds and can't be bothered by facts.
*Refuse to do a stitch of research on this topic.
*Never get within 50 feet of a witness or researcher.
*Attack any book on the topic (except those by the CIA propriety
press: Prometheus).
*Supply gobs and gobs of mis- and dis-information.
*Claim there isn't a credible photo when there has been hundreds if
not
thousands of them, as well as thousands of hours of videos.
*Straw man attack.-they will fa****on a dummy position held by a UFO
researcher. Then proceed to rip it apart. Many will discredit the
researcher on this false premise.
*Invoke authority.
*Dismiss the charges as "old news."
*Set the criteria for "proof" incredibly high so that it could never
be reached.
*Always ignore the first-hand testimony of witnesses to the unexpected
credible sightings.
*Practice scientific research by proclamation not investigation.