Hagar wrote:
> "Sir Arthur" <science@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:2fc8c80d-6202-48c7-81bb-6c46ff70c822@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Jul 16, 4:24 am, www.freedomtofascism.com <tr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:19:45
-0400,www.freedomtofascism.com<tr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:05:01
-0400,www.freedomtofascism.com<tr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> >>On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:22:19 -0700 (PDT), Sir Arthur CB
Wholeflaffers
> >> >>ASA
> >> >><scie...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>>What We Know About UFOs
> >>
> >> >>They don't use money.
> >>
> >> >>Money is the reason you will never achieve what your
extraterrestrial
> >> >>pals
> >> >>have.
> >>
> >> >You wasted your resources keeping fiat currency afloat.
> >>
> >> Earth is finished and you will never be able to re-establish
> >> yourselves on another home planet.
> >
> > It's tough to figure out which useful idiot is more worthless than the
> > other: Casanobrain or Free Dumb. It's pretty much neck to neck!!
>
> The only thing around your neck is your sphincter, you loon, on account
of
> where your head is located. I'm sure you can figure this one out by
your
Hagar, if you had a brain, I said IF, but no, you flushed it down!
Internet Debunking Agenda by "Harold Ensle" <hensle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sat, 7 Apr 2001
The debunking efforts are directed toward making
the UFO subject non-existent in the perception of
all users. This is accomplished by dimini****ng all
serious UFO discussion to the smallest amount and
by trying to discrediting any discussion that does
occur.
This is accomplished through a variety of tactics.
If a serious case is discussed, the disinformant
will purposely use specious arguments employing
common fallacies of logic. He will always try and
misdirect the discussion into irrelevant topics.
Once this occurs, the disinformant has already
succeeded. The most effective misdirection is to
turn the discussion to the poster himself. By
ridiculing the poster, he both "discredits" and
diverts at the same time. A person who is defending
himself against accusations is no longer discussing
the UFO evidence.
Who and how many are required to carry it out? The
abilities of the disinformant should include:
1. A general knowledge of the topic.
2. A general knowledge of science
(only enough to sound convincing).
3. A adequate debating ability.
This is all that is required. The disinformant
does not need to have any knowledge of the cover-up,
or be associated with any government organization.
He can simply be hired. However, it would be better,
if the employed disinformant have some association
to the government where he demonstrated loyalty
(e.g. Ex-military, CIA or Ex-CIA bureaucrat etc.).
He would be hired on some pretense, for example,
to combat the unhealthy increase in delusional UFO
believers, who would be less prepared if there was
a real(worldly) threat to national security.
The UFO disinformation effort would involve three
people. Two who concentrate on the UFO related
news groups (most often cross-posted) and one
who is responsible for the team, its goals and
the overall UFO disinformation on all newsgroups.
Each of these three people have opened 3-5
accounts under various invented names, all of
which can be changed depending on the cir***stances.
This way, they can avoid overplaying a single ID
and also use the other ID's to add sup****t to a
particular position. They can even respond to
their own posts to obtain a desired effect. The
two man team each maintain a primary ID that is
used to form a common and known presence in the
group.
One of the team I will call the "pointman".
His primary-ID purpose is to establish the standard
level of belief and to respond to a large number
of posts promoting this standard. That is he must
directly sup****t the official line which is:
1. There is no evidence that UFO are alien craft.
2. All observations are the result of:
a. Misidentification of natural phenomena
b. Misidentification of aircraft
c. Hallucination
d. Hoax
3. There is no reason to investigate the phenomenon
4. Anyone who disagrees with these first three
statements is either:
a. Ignorant of the facts (or lack of)
b. Delusional
c. Stupid
d. Tricked by UFOlogists
> lonesome.
|
