yeah, no kidding!
i tire of the continuous debate though, of "let's validate it through
science" . . .
(this is not directed at you, just in general) if that's what somenone
wants to do, fine, go do it, present the results in a calm manner, but
don't constantly try to force to an opinion, make it available, and
that's the end of it
my pesonal experience with obes and the like is beyond a rational only
scientific mindset, i believe there is more than rationality, and most
likely will continue to do so, it feels correct for me
On Feb 4, 6:15 pm, KateXe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:47:18 +0200, Kaycee <K...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > h elmer | espeance wrote:
>
> > > insisting only on more logic, to me, won't necessarily help us in
all
> > > endeavors, but combined with being spontaneous, lucid, intuitive,
and
> > > of benevolent intent will; simply being creative and compassionate
>
> > > creativity has only the logic we assign to it - logic has been used
to
> > > perpetuate and distort us historically, in the guise of religions,
> > > politics, and culture as a whole, it is a mode of thinnking that is
as
> > > fallible as the person intent that is using it, so one can be misled
> > > through logic - one person's logic is another person's blasphemy
>
> > Logic, belief, spontaneity, intuition and benevolent intent have all
> > misguided people. None of these tools is any safer in the hands of the
> > wrong user. One person's lucidity is another's madness.
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> So, too, it might be said - "One person's 'wrong user' is another's
Godsend..."
>
> It's all relative. ;-)
|
