Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Paranormal, Crop-circles > Re: 17 Proofs O...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 94 Topic 5687 of 6233
Post > Topic >>

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

by "XeNO" <xeno6696@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 20, 2008 at 09:35 AM

Apparently you use a much broader definition of proof than science does.

If God is the cause of nature, then there should be some aspect of god
that 
is definable and testable.  Oh, and people have tried that... the best 
conclusion one can come up with is that supernatural phenomenon are at
best 
not discernible from natural phenomenon.  So we simply take the simplest 
explanation, because in order to "prove" god did something you would first

have to be able to build a model for god... but you yourself claim that
god 
is uncomprehendible, and beyond human understanding--or do you deny that 
he's posited as being beyond the realm of human senses?

So which is it?

1.  God is comprehendible by man.

2.  God is not comprehendible by man.

If God is not comprehendible by man, then it is fruitless to try to
describe 
nature in terms of God because why should we engage in "comprehending the 
incomprehensible?"  We can only describe nature in terms of nature--we are

limited by our 5 senses, hence Evolution, heliocentrism, quantum physics, 
etc.

If God is comprehendible by man, then there should be some aspect
somewhere 
that we can empirically confirm or refute him... in other words we'd have
to 
have the capacity to prove or disprove God exists--but we've all figured
out 
that this act is not possible.  (Even though lack of evidence certainly 
suggests otherwise.)  So if God is comprehensible by man--what faculty 
allows us to do this?

--XeNO
aa#1901



"HVAC" <MR.HVAC@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:f53cf3c7-85d7-49ac-8566-cc75c202eaf3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Here's the best *proof*
>
>
> 17. THE BIBLE
> Lastly, and most im****tantly, the Bible says that God created the
> universe and every living thing, so the world must have been created.
> In denying this we call God a liar. And so you can see how evolution
> theory undermines the omniscience and even the existence of God. And
> if there is no God, why not do our own thing? Or if God is not all-
> knowing, indeed, a liar, why put our trust in Him? Evolution theory
> logically leads to these humanistic ideas. Christians must take a
> stand for the Word of God, or be accountable on that judgment day for
> the souls of those whom we did not warn.
>
>
> http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evolution%20Hoax/evidences.htm#17
 




 94 Posts in Topic:
17 Proofs Of No Evolution
HVAC <MR.HVAC@[EMAIL P  2008-04-20 04:43:27 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-04-20 15:20:13 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
bushlyed <bushlyed@[EM  2008-04-20 06:25:35 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 13:54:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Conspiracy of Doves <m  2008-04-20 07:20:21 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"XeNO" <xeno  2008-04-20 09:35:30 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Hybrid Angel/Messen  2008-04-23 12:56:52 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David H. Ellison&qu  2008-04-29 04:46:52 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-04-28 21:48:00 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David H. Ellison&qu  2008-04-29 15:56:34 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
BDK <BDK@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-20 12:03:39 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David H. Ellison&qu  2008-04-29 15:59:13 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-20 18:09:21 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-20 19:10:33 
17 Evidences Against Evolution - refuted!
Budikka666 <budikka1@[  2008-04-20 14:20:58 
Re: 17 Evidences Against Evolution - refuted!
"Bill M" <wm  2008-04-20 19:23:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 13:53:07 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-20 23:08:27 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-04-20 21:14:53 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-20 23:15:49 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 15:45:53 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 01:01:30 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 16:26:00 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-21 17:09:52 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 16:01:48 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-04-21 23:04:41 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-22 20:47:06 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-22 07:46:49 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-22 20:46:43 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 01:12:36 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 16:30:36 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Drafterman <drafterman  2008-04-23 14:24:28 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 01:25:27 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-20 21:15:54 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-20 23:50:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-21 07:24:54 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 01:04:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-21 17:11:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 16:04:43 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-22 20:49:11 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-22 19:05:51 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-23 07:15:08 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 17:24:46 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 01:27:26 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 22:23:17 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Azure <laddie'o'lugh@[  2008-04-23 22:01:48 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 09:54:41 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-23 17:22:26 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 17:25:41 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-24 10:08:03 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Hybrid Angel/Messen  2008-04-24 19:32:10 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-20 21:22:21 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-20 23:48:46 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 15:47:13 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"*_//!!_//!!*"   2008-04-22 22:22:36 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 14:40:55 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-23 18:08:18 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"*_//!!_//!!*"   2008-04-24 10:10:38 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"*_//!!_//!!*"   2008-04-24 10:10:24 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-24 18:43:10 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-25 10:22:39 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-24 18:42:17 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 21:23:45 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Richo <m.richardson61@  2008-04-20 21:29:16 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-21 11:07:03 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-22 00:06:23 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-22 00:13:29 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-22 21:00:26 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-22 00:17:48 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-22 02:54:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-23 01:38:28 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-22 19:04:18 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-23 17:19:36 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 17:21:37 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-22 21:08:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-22 19:01:24 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-23 02:48:18 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tervicz <tervicz2003@[  2008-04-23 06:11:05 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Drafterman <drafterman  2008-04-23 08:30:07 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-23 19:54:55 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-23 19:02:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 17:23:16 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 09:04:43 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-24 10:08:03 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-24 10:08:04 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-24 18:05:33 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 23:45:11 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-24 20:18:21 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Art" <art@[  2008-04-24 18:53:06 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-24 22:12:34 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-25 10:26:50 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-24 10:08:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-28 16:00:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David H. Ellison&qu  2008-04-29 16:36:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 5:55:16 CST 2008.