Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Paranormal, Crop-circles > Re: 17 Proofs O...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 94 Topic 5687 of 6233
Post > Topic >>

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X> Apr 23, 2008 at 12:56 PM

"XeNO" <xeno6696@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:YwIOj.58943$097.44145@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Apparently you use a much broader definition of proof than science does.
>
> If God is the cause of nature, then there should be some aspect of god
> that is definable and testable.  Oh, and people have tried that... the
> best conclusion one can come up with is that supernatural phenomenon are
> at best not discernible from natural phenomenon.  So we simply take the
> simplest explanation, because in order to "prove" god did something you
> would first have to be able to build a model for god... but you yourself
> claim that god is uncomprehendible, and beyond human understanding--or
do
> you deny that he's posited as being beyond the realm of human senses?
>
> So which is it?

Between a man made universe and a definable Creation. A Creation.....
>
> 1.  God is comprehendible by man.
>
> 2.  God is not comprehendible by man.

1. Comprehendible...

Read on....
>
> If God is not comprehendible by man, then it is fruitless to try to
> describe nature in terms of God because why should we engage in
> "comprehending the incomprehensible?"  We can only describe nature in
> terms of nature--we are limited by our 5 senses, hence Evolution,
> heliocentrism, quantum physics, etc.
>
> If God is comprehendible by man, then there should be some aspect
> somewhere that we can empirically confirm or refute him... in other
words
> we'd have to have the capacity to prove or disprove God exists--but
we've
> all figured out that this act is not possible.  (Even though lack of
> evidence certainly suggests otherwise.)  So if God is comprehensible by
> man--what faculty allows us to do this?

Interbreeding with Cain....with the Neanderthal......

And inbreeding in his offspring, copulating with the third
brother's offspring.....

And man can comprehend....

Islam & Israel eXist....

But the question is for them, "From where did their seed
originate.....?"

Answer.....The Torah.....

 http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Bible/Genesis16.html
 http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Bible/Genesis17.html

Proof positive there are many gods/Gods. But there is only
ONE....Almighty God....

"And there ain't none else!" <HaShem>

And there really isn't...eXcept for "Bruce & Evan"......lol.....

At least Hollywood acknowledge an Almighty God. and
speculates what a man would do with that power...

How about destroying the 2012 comet Bruce and Evan....
Almighty....?
>
> --XeNO
> aa#1901

~>
Twonky....
An alien in your monitor.....

Hybrid Angel/Messenger.....
>
>
>
> "HVAC" <MR.HVAC@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:f53cf3c7-85d7-49ac-8566-cc75c202eaf3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Here's the best *proof*
>>
>>
>> 17. THE BIBLE
>> Lastly, and most im****tantly, the Bible says that God created the
>> universe and every living thing, so the world must have been created.
>> In denying this we call God a liar. And so you can see how evolution
>> theory undermines the omniscience and even the existence of God. And
>> if there is no God, why not do our own thing? Or if God is not all-
>> knowing, indeed, a liar, why put our trust in Him? Evolution theory
>> logically leads to these humanistic ideas. Christians must take a
>> stand for the Word of God, or be accountable on that judgment day for
>> the souls of those whom we did not warn.
>>
>>
>> http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evolution%20Hoax/evidences.htm#17
>
 




 94 Posts in Topic:
17 Proofs Of No Evolution
HVAC <MR.HVAC@[EMAIL P  2008-04-20 04:43:27 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-04-20 15:20:13 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
bushlyed <bushlyed@[EM  2008-04-20 06:25:35 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 13:54:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Conspiracy of Doves <m  2008-04-20 07:20:21 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"XeNO" <xeno  2008-04-20 09:35:30 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Hybrid Angel/Messen  2008-04-23 12:56:52 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David H. Ellison&qu  2008-04-29 04:46:52 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-04-28 21:48:00 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David H. Ellison&qu  2008-04-29 15:56:34 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
BDK <BDK@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-20 12:03:39 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David H. Ellison&qu  2008-04-29 15:59:13 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-20 18:09:21 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-20 19:10:33 
17 Evidences Against Evolution - refuted!
Budikka666 <budikka1@[  2008-04-20 14:20:58 
Re: 17 Evidences Against Evolution - refuted!
"Bill M" <wm  2008-04-20 19:23:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 13:53:07 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-20 23:08:27 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-04-20 21:14:53 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-20 23:15:49 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 15:45:53 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 01:01:30 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 16:26:00 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-21 17:09:52 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 16:01:48 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-04-21 23:04:41 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-22 20:47:06 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-22 07:46:49 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-22 20:46:43 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 01:12:36 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 16:30:36 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Drafterman <drafterman  2008-04-23 14:24:28 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 01:25:27 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-20 21:15:54 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-20 23:50:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-21 07:24:54 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 01:04:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-21 17:11:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-21 16:04:43 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-22 20:49:11 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-22 19:05:51 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-23 07:15:08 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 17:24:46 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 01:27:26 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 22:23:17 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Azure <laddie'o'lugh@[  2008-04-23 22:01:48 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 09:54:41 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-23 17:22:26 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 17:25:41 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-24 10:08:03 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Hybrid Angel/Messen  2008-04-24 19:32:10 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-20 21:22:21 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-20 23:48:46 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-04-21 15:47:13 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"*_//!!_//!!*"   2008-04-22 22:22:36 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-23 14:40:55 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-23 18:08:18 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"*_//!!_//!!*"   2008-04-24 10:10:38 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"*_//!!_//!!*"   2008-04-24 10:10:24 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-24 18:43:10 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-25 10:22:39 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-24 18:42:17 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 21:23:45 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Richo <m.richardson61@  2008-04-20 21:29:16 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-21 11:07:03 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-22 00:06:23 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-22 00:13:29 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-22 21:00:26 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David St. Albans&qu  2008-04-22 00:17:48 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-22 02:54:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-23 01:38:28 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-22 19:04:18 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-23 17:19:36 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 17:21:37 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-22 21:08:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-22 19:01:24 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA  2008-04-23 02:48:18 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tervicz <tervicz2003@[  2008-04-23 06:11:05 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Drafterman <drafterman  2008-04-23 08:30:07 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Tokay Pino Gris <tokay  2008-04-23 19:54:55 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-23 19:02:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-23 17:23:16 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 09:04:43 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-24 10:08:03 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-24 10:08:04 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-24 18:05:33 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-24 23:45:11 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-24 20:18:21 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Art" <art@[  2008-04-24 18:53:06 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"Mark Earnest"   2008-04-24 22:12:34 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-04-25 10:26:50 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-24 10:08:02 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-04-28 16:00:15 
Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution
"David H. Ellison&qu  2008-04-29 16:36:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 1:30:41 CST 2008.