"Dubh Ghall" <puck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2tdu04di3fuv5cgq3jsfgd255r2na8f7gi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:21:01 +0100, "*_//!!_//!!*"
> <*TheAngel*@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Just because you can't see something with the ****d eye, doesn't mean it
>>doesn't exist. Not all things manifests itself to the ****d eye.
>>
>>Take an atom or quark, for example. Can you SEE it with the ****d eye?
>>No. And back then you also had 'zero proof', but NOW you know it does
>>exist.
>
> Totally irrelevant.
""Totally irrelevant out of context, Baised snip by
www.freedomtofascism.com,
AKA "Dubh Ghall"!
> There is still testable objective evidence.
There wasn't back then.
> There is no objective evidence for a god; any god.
The same as back then, there was no objective evidence for an atom, any
atom,
too, but have since been proven to exist.
Just because you don't know how to objectively test for the existence of a
God/
Gods, doesn't mean they don't exist.
So, ALL will be revealed in its own good time by those who take a Leap of
Faith.
|
