On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:40:53 +0100, "*_//!!_//!!*"
<*TheAngel*@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"Dubh Ghall" <puck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:2tdu04di3fuv5cgq3jsfgd255r2na8f7gi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:21:01 +0100, "*_//!!_//!!*"
>> <*TheAngel*@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>Just because you can't see something with the ****d eye, doesn't mean
it
>>>doesn't exist. Not all things manifests itself to the ****d eye.
>>>
>>>Take an atom or quark, for example. Can you SEE it with the ****d eye?
>>>No. And back then you also had 'zero proof', but NOW you know it does
>>>exist.
>>
>> Totally irrelevant.
>
>""Totally irrelevant out of context, Baised snip by
>www.freedomtofascism.com,
>AKA "Dubh Ghall"!
>
>> There is still testable objective evidence.
>
>There wasn't back then.
>
I think that is the fallacy of moving the goal posts.
....Nono, don't tell me, let me guess: They didn't have goal posts,
back then.
|
