Hybrid Angel/Messenger wrote:
> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:z_udnSQ3KeKUMJbVnZ2dnUVZ_sSlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>David St. Albans wrote:
>>
>
> <<<SNIP a majority of Alban's poop>>>
>
>>>So if Hybrid wants to continue his fallacious arguments, so be it.
>>>Have fun. But it is all specious garbage.
>>>
>>>
>>>Saint
>>
>>
>>Sorry, so far there is no viable scientific evidence that human and
>>neanderthal are anything but as described in Genesis (despite the OP's
>>slightly inaccurate evaluation of the Genesis text).
>
>
> They are NOT described in Genesis.....they are implied...
>
> Not imp lied.....
>
> OP? What is an OP? Me obviously....
>
> What is my 'slight'?.......
>
> 'Cain knew his wife.....?'
>
> The Neanderthal DIDN'T end up in Northern Israel....?
>
> This is wrong.....?
> http://www.livescience.com/health/061115_neanderthal_dna.html
>
> what what WHAT.....is an OP & my slight......?
>
>
>>Genome sequencing is a clear marker only when one understands
>>that similarity is not the ultimate indicator but difference no matter
>>how slight is.
>
>
> Yah.....our similarity in physical and mental attributes....99.5%+
> We essentially live their lifestyle.......
>
> ..../.5%....some scientists say /.1%...difference..... .99.9%.....
>
> A slight difference that makes a HUGE difference....in intelligence...
>
> Take that Atheists.....NyaNya.....Nya....NyaNya.....
>
> <And an Archie Bunker BIG....RASPBERRY....Ahhhhhh! All over the
> monitor.> Oh ****! I destroyed a 19" Sony by hitting the screen with
> my finger nail. This is a 22" Westinghouse. American Made...
>
> Can it be saved.....?
>
> I'll keep you apprised.....
>
> Yes....it's fine....thank you all for waiting.....
>
>>
>>If atheist evolutionists didn't obsess so on proving that God doesn't
>>exist they might get a clearer picture of how science works. In this
>>regard you may benefit from reading some Kuhn:
>>http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Kuhn.html
>
>
> Great do***ent...in My Favorites....
>
> I like these so far...
>
> Chapter VII - Crisis and the Emergence of Scientific Theories.
>
> Yeah...ours is brand spanking new....
>
> Chapter X - Revolutions as Changes of World View.
>
> Yes....again.....ours would put ALL organized and unorganized
> Gods.....down the toilet......
>
>
>>Chapter XII - The Resolution of Revolutions.
>
>
>>How do the proponents of a competing paradigm convert the entire
profession
>>or the relevant subgroup to their way of seeing science and the world?
What
>>causes a group to abandon one tradition of normal research in favor of
>>another? What is the process by which a new candidate for paradigm
replaces
>>its predecessor?
>
>
> Reason, rationality, logic....using common sense....I would think.....
>
> That's what I use.....
>
> My four food group for learning, the rules of thinking......
>
> Are you in genetics, Roy Jose Lorr.....?
>
> The only 'voice' of reason I've 'heard' so far.....
>
> ~>
> Twonky....
>
> Hybrid Angel/Messenger.....
>
> An alien, in your two dimensional monitor, into
> your two dimensional psyche.....
>
> Search COMETA Two D.....
>
> Bring yourself to .....3D.....
>
> And maybe 4/5/6 D....
>
> There are 'things' in and beyond your universe, HaShem's
> "Natural Creation"....
>
> You ****s.....<you know who you are>.....renamed it.....!
>
> To a man made 'universe'.......<it doesn't deserve a 'cap U'.....>
>
> It deserves a....**** U.......!
>
> You denying pathetic Atheists....et....al, need a WAKEUP call!
> Hey....that rhymes....."I'm a poet, and don't even know it....".
> As the saying goes.......
>
> See you in your reply, Lorr......I hope....
>
> Idiot or Genius? Certainly not 'normal' intelligent thinking....
>
> NOBODY has come up with such a "paradigm".....
Your post interests me but in truth, I can't tell when you're being,
funny, sarcastic or serious. The one bit I can make appropriate sense
of and so feel confident in answering is when you say: " Reason,
rationality, logic....using common sense....I would think..... That's
what I use..... My four food group for learning, the rules of
thinking......" My response is: reason lies, with good reason.
|
