"-Alan aa#1608 BAAWA" <alhob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
182467e8-a857-4f38-938e-7c5d24418d64@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Iran has long denied that its government knowingly funneled weapons
> into Iraq or trained ****ite militants there. It has derided the U.S.
> claims as propaganda. Several senior U.S. military officials said the
> weapons caches would undercut the Iranian denials and provide new
> evidence of continuing Iranian sup****t for ****ite militants across
> Iraq.
So, by that logic, when we were supplying the Mujahadeen rebels in
Afghanistan with stinger missles, the Soviets would have been
justified in attacking the US?
-Alan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No. For any number of reasons.
1) The United States has a history of lending a hand to those
countries that we have vanquished. The Soviets were ruthless
in their suppression of civil rights. Both at home and abroad.
2) The simple law of might: The Soviets were afraid of us just
as we were afraid of them. Neither side was stupid or insane enough
to launch a nuclear strike.
This is about a terrorist state, run by religious kooks and them
having
a ****ING NUKE.
