Alternative > Paranormal, Crop-circles > Re: 17 Proofs O...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

by "David H. Ellison" <life@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 29, 2008 at 03:56 PM

How was proof defined in the original post? It appears to be just 
another linguistic gloss.

DanielSan wrote:
> David H. Ellison wrote:
>> I think it is just as ridiculous to allow "science" to define proof,
>
> What do you mean by "proof" in this context?

94 Posts in Topic:

17 Proofs Of No Evolution

HVAC <MR.HVAC@[EMAIL P

2008-04-20 04:43:27

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Richard Anacker <spam.

2008-04-20 15:20:13

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

bushlyed <bushlyed@[EM

2008-04-20 06:25:35

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Seon Ferguson"

2008-04-21 13:54:15

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Conspiracy of Doves <m

2008-04-20 07:20:21

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"XeNO" <xeno

2008-04-20 09:35:30

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Hybrid Angel/Messen

2008-04-23 12:56:52

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David H. Ellison&qu

2008-04-29 04:46:52

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

DanielSan <danielsan19

2008-04-28 21:48:00

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David H. Ellison&qu

2008-04-29 15:56:34

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

BDK <BDK@[EMAIL PROTEC

2008-04-20 12:03:39

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David H. Ellison&qu

2008-04-29 15:59:13

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-20 18:09:21

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-20 19:10:33

17 Evidences Against Evolution - refuted!

Budikka666 <budikka1@[

2008-04-20 14:20:58

Re: 17 Evidences Against Evolution - refuted!

"Bill M" <wm

2008-04-20 19:23:02

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Seon Ferguson"

2008-04-21 13:53:07

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-20 23:08:27

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

DanielSan <danielsan19

2008-04-20 21:14:53

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA

2008-04-20 23:15:49

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Seon Ferguson"

2008-04-21 15:45:53

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-21 01:01:30

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Seon Ferguson"

2008-04-21 16:26:00

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-21 17:09:52

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-21 16:01:48

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Richard Anacker <spam.

2008-04-21 23:04:41

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-22 20:47:06

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-22 07:46:49

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-22 20:46:43

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-21 01:12:36

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Seon Ferguson"

2008-04-21 16:30:36

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Drafterman <drafterman

2008-04-23 14:24:28

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-24 01:25:27

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David St. Albans&qu

2008-04-20 21:15:54

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-20 23:50:15

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-21 07:24:54

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-21 01:04:02

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-21 17:11:15

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-21 16:04:43

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-22 20:49:11

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-22 19:05:51

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-23 07:15:08

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-23 17:24:46

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-24 01:27:26

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-23 22:23:17

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Azure <laddie'o'lugh@[

2008-04-23 22:01:48

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-24 09:54:41

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-23 17:22:26

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-23 17:25:41

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja

2008-04-24 10:08:03

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Hybrid Angel/Messen

2008-04-24 19:32:10

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David St. Albans&qu

2008-04-20 21:22:21

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-20 23:48:46

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Seon Ferguson"

2008-04-21 15:47:13

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"*_//!!_//!!*"

2008-04-22 22:22:36

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-04-23 14:40:55

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA

2008-04-23 18:08:18

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"*_//!!_//!!*"

2008-04-24 10:10:38

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"*_//!!_//!!*"

2008-04-24 10:10:24

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA

2008-04-24 18:43:10

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-25 10:22:39

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA

2008-04-24 18:42:17

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

george <gblack@[EMAIL

2008-04-20 21:23:45

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Richo <m.richardson61@

2008-04-20 21:29:16

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-21 11:07:03

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David St. Albans&qu

2008-04-22 00:06:23

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David St. Albans&qu

2008-04-22 00:13:29

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-22 21:00:26

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David St. Albans&qu

2008-04-22 00:17:48

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-22 02:54:15

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-23 01:38:28

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-22 19:04:18

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-23 17:19:36

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-23 17:21:37

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja

2008-04-22 21:08:02

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-22 19:01:24

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Free Lunch <lunch@[EMA

2008-04-23 02:48:18

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tervicz <tervicz2003@[

2008-04-23 06:11:05

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Drafterman <drafterman

2008-04-23 08:30:07

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Tokay Pino Gris <tokay

2008-04-23 19:54:55

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-23 19:02:02

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-23 17:23:16

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-24 09:04:43

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja

2008-04-24 10:08:03

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja

2008-04-24 10:08:04

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-24 18:05:33

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-24 23:45:11

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-24 20:18:21

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Art" <art@[

2008-04-24 18:53:06

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"Mark Earnest"

2008-04-24 22:12:34

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI

2008-04-25 10:26:50

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja

2008-04-24 10:08:02

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja

2008-04-28 16:00:15

Re: 17 Proofs Of No Evolution

"David H. Ellison&qu

2008-04-29 16:36:06

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 2:01:16 CST 2008.