Re: Americans Deserve To Know...

On 11 Apr 2007 05:33:12 -0700, in alt.astrology, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Apr 10, 10:27 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dee) wrote:
>> Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > On Apr 9, 11:13 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dee) wrote:
>> > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > > > On Apr 8, 12:08 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dee) wrote:
>> > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > > > > > On Apr 7, 9:37 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dee) wrote:
>> > > > > > > seon ferguson <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > "GW Bush: War Criminal" <impe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
>> > > > > > > >news:1hvyxqq.10y6lprgqbqe5N%impeach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > > > > > > seon ferguson <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > >> Yeah why not we tell our kids the Easter bunny and
Santa Clause
>> > > > > > > > >> exists so why not the mythical Godman himself?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > Someone should expose the current WH whopper about
"executive
>> > > > > > > > > privilege" for the fascist ploy that it is.
>>
>> > > > > > > > While there at it they should expose the WMD myths. Its
so sad
>> > > > > > > > some fools still believe it.
>>
>> > > > > > > It is sad. It's also insane. Is Cheney a bot? Even the 9/11
>> > > > > > >re****t said that al Qeada had no ties with Iraq:
>> > > > > > >http://tinyurl.com/2rfoc4
>>
>> > > > > > There's a bit of leftist "common knowledge" that (as usual)
is just
>> > > > > > plain false. The 9/11 Commission Re****t DID say Saddam had a
loose
>> > > > > > working agreement with bin Laden. That is what was believed,
at the
>> > > > > > time, by intelligence agencies.
>>
>> > > > > Not even close.
>>
>> > > > Another lie of the left.
>>
>> > > Bull****.
>>
>> > > > > > If newer information has disproven the old information, and
you
>> > > > > > expected the government to know at the time (in advance) that
the
>> > > > > > information they had was wrong, that's called 20/20
hindsight. And
>> > > > > > one thing leftists seem to be very good at is using their
>> > > > > > excellent 20/20 hindsight to its maximum potential for
cynical
>> > > > > > political purposes.
>>
>> > > > > >http://www.9-11commission.gov/re****t/911Re****t_Ch2.htm
>>
>> > > > > Maybe you should read the whole thing. "But to date we have
seen no
>> > > > > evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into
a
>> > > > > collaborative operational relation****p. Nor have we seen
evidence
>> > > > > indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or
>> > > > > carrying out any attacks against the United States."
>>
>> > > > If you meant there was no "collaborative operational
relation****p,"
>> > > > why didn't you say that? Just saying there were "no ties" is a
lie of
>> > > > the left.
>>
>> > > Silly semantics. The kind of ties that you're whinging about are
>> > > completely pissant, and have been discounted in all the summaries
as
>> > > meaningless.
>>
>> > They kept reaching out to each other.
>>
>> Pooh. The bin Laden family has been in bed with the Bush family for
>> many, many years.
>
>The bin Laden family you're referring to had disowned Osama. And what
>does this have to do with what you inaccurately said the 9/11
>Commission Re****t re****ted?

Not really Fact is he was re****ted and filmed being a guest of honor
at a family wedding after 9/11.

>> After 9/11 the bin Ladens were flown out of the US,
>> _even though every other plane on the hemisphere was grounded_.
>
>Yes, that was done by the famed Richard Clarke, who also worked for
>President Clinton. It was cleared by the FBI, who interrogated those
>members of the bin Laden family (who had nothing to do with Osama, as
>the FBI knew from previous interviews) before their flight left the
>country.

sure!


-- 
Ak'toh'di