Steven Douglas <dsteven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 11:44 pm, impe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(GW Bush: War Criminal) wrote:
> > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On Apr 13, 11:03 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 12, 11:01 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Apr 11, 11:23 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 10:27 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 9, 11:13 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee)
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 8, 12:08 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee)
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 7, 9:37
pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seon ferguson <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "GW Bush: War Criminal"
<impe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>news:1hvyxqq.10y6lprgqbqe5N%impeach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seon ferguson <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Yeah why not we tell our kids the
Easter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> bunny and Santa Clause exists so why
not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> the mythical Godman himself?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Someone should expose the current WH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whopper about "executive privilege"
for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the fascist ploy that it is.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While there at it they should expose the
WMD
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > myths. Its so sad some fools still
believe it.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is sad. It's also insane. Is Cheney a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >bot? Even the 9/11 re****t said that al
Qeada
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >had no ties with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Iraq:http://tinyurl.com/2rfoc4
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's a bit of leftist "common knowledge"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that (as usual) is just plain false. The
9/11
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Commission Re****t DID say Saddam had a loose
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > working agreement with bin Laden. That is
what
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was believed, at the time, by intelligence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > agencies.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not even close.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Another lie of the left.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bull****.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If newer information has disproven the old
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information, and you expected the government
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to know at the time (in advance) that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information they had was wrong, that's
called
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20/20 hindsight. And one thing leftists seem
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be very good at is using their excellent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20/20 hindsight to its maximum potential for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cynical political purposes.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >>http://www.9-11commission.gov/re****t/911Re****t_Ch2.htm
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you should read the whole thing. "But to
date
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we have seen no evidence that these or the
earlier
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > contacts ever developed into a collaborative
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > operational relation****p. Nor have we seen
evidence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda
in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > developing or carrying out any attacks against
the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > United States."
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If you meant there was no "collaborative
operational
> > > > > > > > > > > > > relation****p," why didn't you say that? Just
saying
> > > > > > > > > > > > > there were "no ties" is a lie of the left.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Silly semantics. The kind of ties that you're
> > > > > > > > > > > > whinging about are completely pissant, and have
been
> > > > > > > > > > > > discounted in all the summaries as meaningless.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > They kept reaching out to each other.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Pooh. The bin Laden family has been in bed with the
Bush
> > > > > > > > > > family for many, many years.
> >
> > > > > > > > > The bin Laden family you're referring to had disowned
Osama.
> >
> > > > > > > > That's another fib.http://tinyurl.com/ys8lz8
> >
> > > > > > > Okay, you've managed to divert the discussion away from your
> > > > > > > inaccurate statement that the 9/11 Commisison Re****t said
> > > > > > > there were no ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda, when you
> > > > > > > obviously meant to say there was not collaborative
operational
> > > > > > > relation****p (which is not the same as no ties).
> >
> > > > > > Wrong again. And when are you planning to try to defend your
total
> > > > > > fabrication, "[t]hey kept reaching out to each other"?
> > > > > If two people with no collaborative operational relation****p
hold
> > > > > occasional meetings, over a course of years, in which they
discuss
> > > > > combining their resources for a possible collaborative
partner****p,
> > > > > you would consider those meetings to mean nothing? Very strange.
> >
> > > > What's strange is that you have no proof of these meetings, yet
you
> > > > insist that they occurred.
> >
> > > No, I insist that the 9/11 Commission Re****t said they occurred.
> >
> > "They kept reaching out to each other." is what you said.
> > Holding occasional meetings, discussing resourses; which came from
> > *your* imagination.
>
> No, it came from the 9/11 Commission Re****t, which has been my point
> all along.
Hardly. Besides:
"If newer information has disproven the old information, and you
expected the government to know at the time (in advance) that the
information they had was wrong, that's called 20/20 hindsight."
I *expect* that Dickie Cheney should, as VP, accept the fact that Iraq
and al Qeada had no ties (even if you can't).
They do now, BTW. Mission Accomplished!!
> > >This all started when you said the 9/11 Commission Re****t said there
> > >were "no ties" between Iraq and Al Qaeda. My entire conversation with
> > >you is about what the 9/11 Commission Re****t did or did not say.
> >
> > That's funny, 'cause there's a ****load of words from you in this
thread
> > that say otherwise.
>
> That's because I fell into the trap of responding to distractions,
> such as the one you're trying to draw me into. Read the 9/11
> Commission Re****t. It says there were numerous contacts between Iraq
> and Al Qaeda over a period of years. It's not that hard to read the
> page I've linked to earlier in this thread. Read it.
I read it. When someone answers your call and says "no" to your pitch,
you don't have a tie* with them. Just like he said; no connections, no
tie.
TIE n. 1. A cord, string, or other means by which something is tied.
2. Something that connects or unites; a link: a blood tie; marital
ties.
3. A necktie.
"The most im****tant thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our
number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that
said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care.
It's not that im****tant. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
--
http://tinyurl.com/2rfoc4
http://iraqbodycount.org
http://www.stopiranwar.com
|
