fSteven Douglas <dsteven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 17, 10:26 pm, impe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(GW Bush: War Criminal) wrote:
> > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On Apr 15, 11:44 pm, impe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(GW Bush: War Criminal)
wrote:
> > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 13, 11:03 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Apr 12, 11:01 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 11:23 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 10:27 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee)
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 9, 11:13 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee)
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 8, 12:08 pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steven Douglas <dste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 7,
9:37
> > pm, deelil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dee) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seon ferguson <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "GW Bush: War Criminal"
<impe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>news:1hvyxqq.10y6lprgqbqe5N%impeach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >mp.ca... > seon ferguson
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ><s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Yeah why not we tell our kids the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Easter bunny and Santa Clause
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> exists so why not the mythical
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Godman himself?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Someone should expose the current
WH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whopper about "executive
privilege" for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the fascist ploy that it is.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While there at it they should expose
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the WMD myths. Its so sad some fools
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > still believe it.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is sad. It's also insane. Is Cheney
a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >bot? Even the 9/11 re****t said that al
Qeada
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >had no ties with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Iraq:http://tinyurl.com/2rfoc4
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's a bit of leftist "common
knowledge"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that (as usual) is just plain false. The
9/11
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Commission Re****t DID say Saddam had a
loose
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > working agreement with bin Laden. That
is what
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was believed, at the time, by
intelligence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > agencies.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not even close.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another lie of the left.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bull****.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If newer information has disproven the
old
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information, and you expected the
government
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to know at the time (in advance) that
the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information they had was wrong, that's
called
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20/20 hindsight. And one thing leftists
seem
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be very good at is using their
excellent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20/20 hindsight to its maximum potential
for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cynical political purposes.
> >
> > > >>http://www.9-11commission.gov/re****t/911Re****t_Ch2.htm
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you should read the whole thing.
"But
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to date we have seen no evidence that
these
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or the earlier contacts ever developed
into
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a collaborative operational relation****p.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nor have we seen evidence indicating that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in
developing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or carrying out any attacks against the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > United States."
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you meant there was no "collaborative
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > operational relation****p," why didn't you
say
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that? Just saying there were "no ties" is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lie of the left.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Silly semantics. The kind of ties that you're
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > whinging about are completely pissant, and
have been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > discounted in all the summaries as
meaningless.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > They kept reaching out to each other.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Pooh. The bin Laden family has been in bed with
the Bush
> > > > > > > > > > > > family for many, many years.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The bin Laden family you're referring to had
disowned
> > > > > > > > > > >Osama.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > That's another fib.http://tinyurl.com/ys8lz8
> >
> > > > > > > > > Okay, you've managed to divert the discussion away from
your
> > > > > > > > > inaccurate statement that the 9/11 Commisison Re****t
said
> > > > > > > > > there were no ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda, when you
> > > > > > > > > obviously meant to say there was not collaborative
operational
> > > > > > > > > relation****p (which is not the same as no ties).
> >
> > > > > > > > Wrong again. And when are you planning to try to defend
your
> > > > > > > total > fabrication, "[t]hey kept reaching out to each
other"?
> > > > > > > If two people with no collaborative operational relation****p
> > > > > > > hold occasional meetings, over a course of years, in which
> > > > > > > they discuss combining their resources for a possible
> > > > > > > collaborative partner****p, you would consider those meetings
> > > > > > > to mean nothing? Very strange.
> >
> > > > > > What's strange is that you have no proof of these meetings,
yet you
> > > > > > insist that they occurred.
> >
> > > > > No, I insist that the 9/11 Commission Re****t said they occurred.
> >
> > > > "They kept reaching out to each other." is what you said.
> > > > Holding occasional meetings, discussing resourses; which came from
> > > > *your* imagination.
> >
> > > No, it came from the 9/11 Commission Re****t, which has been my point
> > > all along.
> >
> > Hardly. Besides:
> >
> > "If newer information has disproven the old information, and you
> > expected the government to know at the time (in advance) that the
> > information they had was wrong, that's called 20/20 hindsight."
>
> What's your point?
Again you're dishonest. Editing lines that have already answered your
stupid, whinging, repetitive questions isn't kosher. You should know
this by now.
Furthermore: you're an ignorant, petty, arsehole who wouldn't know a tie
if it whacked him in the face and then choked him.
Worst; you're tedious, stupid, and incredibly credulous, just like every
other half-baked, brain-free neocon wor****pper who still has his head
stuck firmly up Bu****e's flabby white arse.
Good luck with that.
--
http://www.stopiranwar.com
|
