Re: Lawyer Presents Case for Afterlife - Use Your Own Judgment

Kimba W. Lion wrote:
> Cardinal Chunder <cc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> It means I can imagine up all kinds of claptrap to explain some event, 
>> but it doesn't make it right. And there no reason to favour a 
>> complicated explanation if simpler one exists and (more than)
adequately 
>> explains events.
>>
>> As is the case with people asserting afterlife.
> 
> So in your view it is simpler to assume that, when someone asserts
> something you don't know about or don't want to know about, that person
> must be imagining things

Nope. Go and read what Occam's Razor means.

> --see my earlier comment about Occam's Razor.
> Calling this an adequate explanation of events is simply a failure to
> correlate all the factors involved.

What factors are you referring to now? Are you going to astound us with 
actual proof for the afterlife as opposed to the usual hearsay?