Bob Officer <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:0amhp35a00u4m30v5ed5glqvegjmb2j9a8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:15:28 -0800, in alt.abortion, Robert
> <robpar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:32:38 -0500, "Mitch Dickson"
>><mitchelldickson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>"Abort Abortionists" <abort.murderers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>message news:4bc005c09e2a44ab1bce76219c1b4f47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, MarkA <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> >I'm being completely serious. I cannot understand why people
>>>> >oppose abortion. Can someone please explain it to me?
>>>
>>>Ignoring the gobblydgook of the previous poster let me make a couple
>>>of simple statements.
>>
>>Call a simple statement gobblydgook, then spew pure nonsense.
>>
>>> An athiest, or one who believes that life is only physical can
>>> accept abortion.
>>
>>An atheist simply doesn't fall for simple minded scams. BTW only about
>>15% of the population is atheist.
>
> I've often wondered about the labels we are using, theist atheist,
> and agonistic. I've always wonder where I fit in. You see, I don't
> think if there is a god/creator/force, it cares or screws with
> people's lives in a daily basis or ever has. Theists try to apply
> their own concepts and molds forcing god into a human form. A form
> with human emotions and human needs. When they state god wants to be
> wor****ped, adored, prayed to and served, they are doing just that,
> forcing their god into molds of their own creation, modeling God
> after their own desires. Then for some reason they end up creating an
> entire mythos of an afterlife, the so called reward, and carrot and
> stick system to force them into an ethical behavior.
>
>
>>But 75-80% of the population is
>>pro-choice. Being pro-choice is not by any means a requirement of
>>being atheist. In fact many atheist oppose abortions, because it cause
>>potential atheist to be aborted. Nothing like a Christian home to
>>raise an atheist child.
>
> See again we create labels. Pro-choice and pro-life. these labels are
> not even close to being descriptions.
>
> There are only too sides to the Abortion issue, with some minor lines
> drawn in the finer details. The side are really nothing and
> pro-choice (freedom to choose for ones self) and the other side is
> anti-choice (freedom of no choices for ones self).
>
> The with the anti-choice group, their choice is to remove the freedom
> of anyone but "biological chance" to remove a fertilized egg, and
> carrying to term of a ova. "Biological Chance" is the statistical
> fact that the majority become of fertilized human embryos do not
> implanted.
>
> To complicate the anti-choice side and muddy the waters, there is a
> group within itself which would stop all forms of birth control
> (conception control) of any sort. The odd thing is this part of the
> anti-choice side is lead by a dictatorial group of men, who have
> taken vows of chastity, never to father children.
>
> Then to look even to the so called pro-life groups, they are lead by
> people that at against all forms of social welfare, child health
> care, and disease prevention. Some of anti-choice are even people
> that owe money for child sup****t and are guilty of child abuse. Some
> of the So called pro-life force are for killing people that are
> pro-choice.
>
> <snip>
>
> The issue is always about choice and freedom.
>
> The anti-choice side is all about removing freedom and controlling
> people. Simple isn't it.
>
> The pro-choice side is for allowing people the most freedom of choice
> available. Birth control, Abortion, adoption, chastity, even
> vasectomy/tubal ligation are all choices and option, options of
> freedom which the anti-choice would like to have full control by
> removing all options and choices.
>
> In our little discussions here remember do let the
> anti-choice/antifreedom people apply false labels or bring up false
> issues.
>
> It all about freedom and choice and control. Who better to have
> control? Who better to make choices? Who better to exercise the
> responsibility of freedom?
>
Excellent post / response Bob. Thanks and keep up the good workm for the
good (pro-choice) cause.
>
>
>
|
