shut up idiot.
"Awais Nazir" <waqas.faheem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:711ccedd-4b96-4428-a7ad-72cb7cb6fa53@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Humans came on earth about ten-thousand years ago. I recommend to keep
> off the high-school education bias, and then read on.
>
> Earth is about 4.5-billion years old, as uranium-dating proves.
>
> Reason 1: Humans are clever, they don't take tens of thousands of
> years to develop scientifically/population-wise.
>
> Reason 2: a simple human intelligence can produce pottery, they should
> have been well a few hundred thousand years ago. But we do not find
> Pottery before ten-thousand years ago. Pottery came "suddenly" in
> archeologist records.
>
> Reason 3: Archeology record suggests agriculture to come into scene
> "suddenly" about ten-thousand years, (Is human as dumb that for tens
> of thousands of years they were just hunting?). Intuition says that if
> there would be a first society, then it would be both hunters/farmers.
> If Archeology says that agriculture started about ten-thousand years
> ago, then humanity should have come about ten-thousand years ago, on
> Earth.
>
> Reason 4: Archeologists find that organised housing "suddenly"
> appeared about ten thousand years ago, (Are humans dumb enough, that
> they lived for tens of thousands of years just roaming the earth,
> without proper place to settle).
>
> Reason 5: First chinese writing came in about 1500 BC, and that first
> American writing came in about 800 BC by the Zapotec people, first
> Egypt writing came in about 3100 BC, (Are humans that dumb, that they
> never wrote the previous socalled many tens of thousands of years).
> These dates show that, the first humans should come about 10-thousand
> years ago, so that they gain enough population/experience to
> effectively run the commerce/government through writing.
>
> Reason 6: GENETICISTS HAD MATHEMATICALLY PROVED THAT, THE HUMAN GENE
> IS STABLE FOR 20-MILLION YEARS INTO FUTURE!WITH CURRENT MUTATION
> RATES. NOW THE QUESTION IS: HOW CAN A SOCALLED SERIES OF EVOLUTION
> FROM LAST COUPLE OF HUNDRED OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS, FROM APE TO MAN
> HALT ABRUPTLY FOR THE NEXT 20-MILLION YEARS? (MONKEY TO MAN IS A GREAT
> SOCALLED LEAP FORWARD IN GENES. GENES ARE SO SO SO STABLE THAT WE CAN
> FIND EVEN TODAY THE SPECIES WHICH ALSO EXISTED BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD
> IN FOSSIL RECORDS; WE ARE MAKING A VERY BIG STATEMENT WHEN WE SAY THAT
> MONKEY GENE BECAME HUMAN GENE IN A COUPLE OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF
> YEARS.).
>
> Reason 7: The mesopotamian scientific trend occurred about twenty-
> seventh century BC, of Greece about third century BC, of Muslim about
> tenth century AD, of European about Sixteenth Century BC. What rule
> joins them? Every next trend occurred after a previous one, nearly
> after half the time period between previous two trends. For example,
> Meso-Greece period in 25 centuries, Greece-Muslim period is twelve and
> half centuries, muslim-european period is about six centuries, and so
> next trend should occur at about three centuries latter from sixteenth
> centures, ie ninteenth century (which is the American Science Period).
> If I call the first Science Period as Adamic, then Adamic SP should
> occur about 7700 BC (approx. 8000 BC), i.e. about ten-thousand years
> ago. Conclusion: The first Science Period was Adamic and it occurred
> about 8000 BC. (Anthropologists suggest that the current humans, i.e.
> homo-sapians, were existant on earth for atleast 200 thousand years,
> according to their calculations; thus, the intelligence which humans
> currently possess, was with humans for atleast 200 thousand years.
> But, humanity would be colonizing other galaxies, had it been of the
> age of 200 thousand years.). Humans are not dumb that they take many
> tens of thousands of years to develop population/scientifically.
>
> Reason 8: Summerian and Egyptian Civilizations started about 3500 BC;
> Indus and Minoan and Akkadian and Andes Cvilisations started about
> 2500 BC; Chinese Civilization started about 2200 BC; doesn't it all
> hint: if it took 5000-years for human to develop from past Egyptian
> civilization to the development that is now, then about 5000-thousand
> years should have took from a first human pair to develop into
> Egyptian civilization, totalling 10-thousand years of human existence
> on earth, (It is as evident as is sun).
>
> Reason 9: Now, Pyramids as in Egypt/Amerindian can exist for many ten-
> thousands of years. If humanity has an age of more than ten-thousand
> years, then it can safely be argued that there should exist similar
> more societies like Egyptian/Amerindian, and thus a multitude of
> pyramids covering the earth, each showing its history; but we can't
> find such sustaining structures as pyramids preceding the time about
> 3-4 thousand years ago. This all shows that, no bias: Egyptian/
> Amerindian were the first to make Pyramids, if humanity was more than
> ten-thousand years in age then similar pyramids should have been found
> but there exist none, thus humanity can't be more than ten-thousand
> years in age; no bias: God is needed to create the intelligent
> creature as a human. (It is not that Stone structures before 10-
> thousand years decayed, because stone/bone/fossils can date millions/
> billions of years).
>
> It may be argued that ice-age thawed about ten-thousand years ago, and
> that's why one saw agriculture/etc thriving after it, (but equator
> never faced the bitter of ice, so civilization should have continued
> at equator, nullifying the previous argument).
>
> God modified the mamal gene to make human. Proof? Appendix has no work
> in humans, but still exists, but is required in many other mammals.
> Also, sea-plant is almost 85% human gene.
>
> THE SKELATONS WE FIND TODAY OF SO-CALLED PREHUMANS ARE ACTUALLY
> MONKEYS. THERE ARE MANY KIND OF MONKEYS, SOME ARE SMALL, SOME ARE MORE
> MAN-LIKE E.G. GORILLAS IN PHYSIQUE/INTELLIGENCE; AND LUCY/ETC ARE JUST
> ONE OF THE SPECTRUM OF THE VARIED KINDS OF MONKEYS (IF ANYONE IS HURT
> BY THE PREVIOUS SENTENCE, I APOLOGIZE FOR IT.).
>
> The rate of the human population growth has not been constant, the
> rate is much higher now because of advanced medical facilities. So, if
> we take this rate as constant, then this is not the right approach.
>
> Now, there are two things, wars and famines. Which of them puts an
> upper limit to the human population? Inconclusively, it is famine, not
> war. Reason: war was almost common throughout the world, but famine
> was more widespread in places where there is less vegetation; So,
> India/China are majors in population not because they faced less wars
> in past, but that they had less famines, compared to other
> countries.Conclusion: wars don't diminish the human population, if it
> does then it is immediately healed, but that food limits the human
> population. So, we can't say that it were cannibals in past that is
> why it took humanity many tens of thousands of years to develop
> population/scientifically.
>
> If ***** continues of 8 generations, then the people becomes
> different from eachother, as if they belong to different races. I will
> not say *****, but that different places shut people off from
> eachother, and they became different after some generations. The Black
> in Africa, and Blond is Sweden, occurred, because a Blond in Africa
> died an early death due to ultra-violet sun ray harm, and same for the
> Balck in Sweden where it died of lack of Vitamin-D.
>
> Anti-thesis: human beings can't be from this earth, because about ten-
> thousand years ago, sudden intelligence came on the surface of Earth.
> So, what if Aliens came to earth about ten-thousand years ago, now
> called as humans? It is very less probable, because why aliens came
> not in the 4-billion history of earth and only in last ten-thousand
> years? Also, Aliens most probably had to die because they are not
> immune to earthly bectarias/etc.
>
> Despite the fact that I had proved the landing of Adam on Earth, ten-
> thousand years ago, current mindset has difficulty accepting it,
> because, it then has to accept the existance of God.
>
> Atheists say that this world is by chance; Well, what if, god intended
> this world to appear as such, for some reason?
>
> Conclusion: Above argument only proves that God exists, (because God
> is required to create the first man, about 10-thousand years ago). But
> is that God really interested in us? Yes, God is indeed interested in
> us through Messenger****p (www.awais-nazir.biz).
|
