On Mon, 26 May 2008 08:13:31 -0400, Pastor Dave
<ananias917_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Mon, 26 May 2008 04:55:07 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
><wanglese@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> spake thusly:
>
>
>So to you, insults are scientific proof. Gotcha!
It's called "cutting to the chase"
Or calling a spade a spade.
No need to debate moronic ideas that don't stand up to critical
thinking.
>
>Bye now!
>
>
>>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:26:28 -0700 (PDT), Awais Nazir
>><waqas.faheem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>Humans came on earth about ten-thousand years ago. I recommend to keep
>>>off the high-school education bias, and then read on.
>>>
>>>Earth is about 4.5-billion years old, as uranium-dating proves.
>>
>>That's idiot remark number one--
>>
>>You don't understand the geology, chemistry and physics of the
>>multiplicity of evidence that is used.
>>
>>So you are arguing from a position of abysmal ignorance to begin with.
>>
>>>
>>>Reason 1: Humans are clever, they don't take tens of thousands of
>>>years to develop scientifically/population-wise.
>>
>>That's idiot remark number 2. Where to begin?
>>
>>You don't understand the early development of societies, information
>>etc.
>>
>>>
>>>Reason 2: a simple human intelligence can produce pottery, they should
>>>have been well a few hundred thousand years ago. But we do not find
>>>Pottery before ten-thousand years ago. Pottery came "suddenly" in
>>>archeologist records.
>>
>>Idiot remark number 3. See "fire". Pottery doesn't work very well
>>without it.
>>Once figured out, along with other things, development was rapid, and
>>accelerated.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Reason 3: Archeology record suggests agriculture to come into scene
>>>"suddenly" about ten-thousand years, (Is human as dumb that for tens
>>>of thousands of years they were just hunting?). Intuition says that if
>>>there would be a first society, then it would be both hunters/farmers.
>>>If Archeology says that agriculture started about ten-thousand years
>>>ago, then humanity should have come about ten-thousand years ago, on
>>>Earth.
>>
>>That's idiot remark number 4.
>>
>>Normally it's 3 strikes and you are out.
>>
>>The rest of your arguments are as stupid as the first one.
>>
>>Go back to school, and instead of spending your time at the back of
>>the class pulling your pud and picking your nose, learn something this
>>time.
>><snip o' nonsense>
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
How to Cook an Alien:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/Alien_recipes.html
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
|
