On 22 Jul, 16:11, To You <leonardo_b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> =A0THEY - lunatics - think, that "Scientology works."
>
> '
>
> Why lunatics "promote 'Scientology,' and how:"
>
> > Re: Example of 'lunatics celebrated by the "critics" of Scientology'
>
> Actually, the lunatics (and many "critics") think, that
>
> =A0"Scientology is good, therefore it has to be destroyed:"
>
> Truth is absolute, you see - they really think that 'Scientology'
> =A0has the correct data, and that 'Scientology' finds out about
> =A0people - so they feel threatened considerably, and thus
>
> "Scientology has to be destroyed," "BECAUSE it is good."
>
> Truth is absolute, you see - they really think that.
> '
>
> That's lunatics and many "critics" of 'Scientology,' who think
> =A0that - no matter what they SAY, or write, in public.
>
> So they - being Criminal Minds - say the reverse of what
> =A0they think: They THINK 'Scientology' is a danger that is
> capable of exposing them and their ilk.
>
> =A0THEY - lunatics - think, that "Scientology works."
>
> So =A0in order to combat it, they say, that it does not work,
> =A0etc..
>
> I wrote previously:
>
> Actually, I am a human rights philosopher and poet, and thus,
> =A0by definition, I am opposed to 'Scientology' and 'Scientologists,'
> =A0and in particular, I am opposed to the demonic creature called
> =A0l. ron hubbard, the one who scribbled 'Scientology.'
>
> But a loon can't know that, now, can he.
>
> And another thing, we don't burn or stone people here - for that, you
> have to go back to where you came from (which does exist, by the way,
> as proven already by your existence).
>
> '
>
> '
>
> The loon reacted as a lunatic, indeed, and as expected, to
> my writing earlier:
>
> Now isn't that a pleasure, to call the poster a loon, when the poster
> =A0is one actually, and also should be called so and pointed out.
>
> This applies to those who acclaim and sup****t the poster's lunacy
> =A0(insanity, intentional refusal of reason), as well.
>
> The loon (lunatic, insane person, lacking all reason, maliciously
> =A0denying all relevant facts and vital data necessary to lead a happy
> =A0life) wrote anonymously "fearing persecution" by exposing self as a
> =A0lunatic - wrote, of course via an anonymizing service - thusly:
>
> '
>
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:10:05 +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > Date: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:10:05
+020=
0 (CEST)
> > From: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Nomen Nescio
<nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Mail-To-News-Contact: =A0ab...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Message-ID: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
=A0<6bf248899f19287a776eb7dd9a98c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Newsgroups: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0alt.religion.scientology
> > Organization: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0mail2n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Path: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
=A0nova.planet.nl!spool05.wxs.nl!=
spool05.wxs.nl!divide.nova.planet.nl!newsfeeder.wxs.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!n=
ewsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!news.d=
izum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
> > Subject: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 thetanology
> > Xref: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0nova.planet.nl
alt.religion.sc=
ientology:660695
> > MIME-Version: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01.0
> > Content-Type: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0text/plain
> > there is no spirit.
> > there's no soul.
> > brains are comprised of neurons.
> > neurons store your thoughts, your experiences, your memory, your ego,
y=
our
> > id, your conscious mind, your subconscious mind, etc... in essence,
> > everything that is "you".
> > cut off the oxygen to brain and the neurons decay. =A0the
electrochemic=
al
> > energy within them dissipates like smoke into the surrounding system.
> > this is death... and in death - you slip into oblivion. =A0we know
ther=
e are
> > often massive firings of neurons prior to the moment where they stop
> > working entirely - and believe this to be the substance of many
NDE's.b=
ut
> > when that's over... it's over. time stops for you... nothing happens
pa=
st
> > that point.
> > it's a hard pill to swallow for a lot of humans. even the most
intellig=
ent
> > of us through history held some religious belief.
> > all humans believe something different. there are many concepts, some
> > converge, some diverge.. but it is im****tant to remember that all of
th=
ese
> > beliefs, every idea about god exists within the human brain.
> > picking apart religious doctrines of various faiths is the past-time
of
> > many skeptics. =A0skeptics enjoy nothing more than casting doubt.
> > these people are the same children in the first grade who are aware
tha=
t
> > there's no santa claus, who then go to task telling their peers that
sa=
nta
> > is a lie.
> > you cannot take santa claus away from little kids, it upsets them. you
> > cannot take god away from people - it hurts them. they cannot handle
th=
e
> > concept that nothing happens when you die. =A0you simply cease to
exist=
..
> > you stop thinking - time stops. life goes on without you.
> > there is good news in that message. =A0when you die... you don't care,
> > because you don't know about it... because you have nothing to know
thi=
ngs
> > with.
> > try to wrap your head around that and you will see the comfort in it.
> > or don't
> > go on having religious beliefs... no matter how strange they may seem
t=
o
> > anyone... it's normal human nature to believe strange things... and
peo=
ple
> > will believe all sorts of strange things.
> > picking apart scientology is pretty simple because lrh had too many
hol=
es
> > in his education.
> > there's an overwhelming amount of information available from all
corner=
s
> > of the sciences which dispel and disprove the premise behind the deep
> > doctrine of his religion.
> > as a belief system in and of itself - there's nothing more wrong with
i=
t
> > than there is any other religious belief.
> > there is no other subject on earth that can take a lay person with no
> > higher education and no mathematical ability and turn them into an
expe=
rt
> > sage and scholarly figure than religion.
> > everyone is an expert on television watching, making television
program=
s,
> > commercials and even how to use their remote control however, very
very
> > few people are actually capable of constructing a television.
> > when you understand the underlying physical laws which govern matter
in
> > this closed system, and when you understand the underpinnings of
matter
> > enough to comprehend the mechanics behind carbon 14 dating, it is
comic=
al
> > to see or hear someone dismiss it in the name of religion.
> > there are too many people who dismiss scientific theory as "a wild
gues=
s".
> > scientific theory is not a guess by any means. scientific theory is
bas=
ed
> > on observation, laws and empirical evidence. =A0the scientific process
> > requires testable models and accurate prediction of results. =A0in
many
> > disciplines it requires an understanding of advanced mathematics.
=A0fo=
r
> > most people this is hard and as a result, they ignore it in favor of
mo=
re
> > simple things.
> > what the imaginations of men construct to explain natural laws and
> > physical science is very rarely even remotely close to the truth.
> > there are too many examples of this through history,
>
> (...)
>
> > there's no body thetans.
> > there's no soul
> > there's no heavens
> > there's no hells
> > there's no astral projection
> > there is no life after death
> > there are no ghosts.
>
> (...)
>
> The quotes above, are what actual, real, vile criminals want you to
> =A0believe, in their vain hope that they will not be recognized nor
> =A0found out, and (they are) intending to make you or others that
> =A0stupid and insane, that any evidence of their vile crimes, murder,
> =A0torture and the like, would be denied.
>
> And of course, these are the first ones to falsely accuse others of
> =A0their own crimes - in order to hide their own vile crimes. They
> =A0really do that, isn't it, Frederic L. Rice...
>
> Very simple, is it not? Elementary. Spoken thus, by arguably the
> =A0most Intelligent, the most Beautiful and the most Caring philosopher
> =A0known, and on top of that, the most Truthful and most trusted
> =A0philosopher known on Earth and beyond,
>
> KNT hrp&p
>
> Copyright 2008 by KNT hrp&p
> Copyright Conditions as usual ('learnware')
>
> _________
> Reference:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0'Can Anyone ACTUALLY Define (Scientology) 'Putting Ethics In'
> =A0 =A0 =A0 (on a person or group or "on the planet")? (ref. Tom Cruise
> =A0 =A0 =A0 video on 'Scientology') Re: {HRI note 20080626-V2.0}
> =A0 =A0 =A0
("Disconnection")http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.tv/m=
sg/2e1b3664073be9fb
>
> On Jul 21, 2:08 pm, Insanity's Looner <elv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > To You <leonardo_b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Now isn't that a pleasure, to call the poster a loon, when the
poster
> > > =A0is one actually, and also should be called so and pointed out.
>
> > You said it!
>
> > --
> > =A0David Silverman
>
> '
>
> '
>
> '
>
> Lunatics can only say lunatic things. Thus it came to pass,
> =A0that =A0the lunatic John Baker, on Jul 21, 4:55 pm,
> ( John Baker <nu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:17:11 -0700 (PDT), To You
>
> > <leonardo_b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > <snippage>
>
> > The doctor gave you those pills for a reason, son.
>
> ... what the lunatic could write.
>
> The same lunatic, John Baker, recently wrote, that he wished
> =A0to push a burning cigarette into someone's behind.
ITT Babbles talks to herself using two Socks
Jinkii
|
