From Garoweonline.com
OPINION
U.S-Russia Tensions: World War III around the Corner
Apr 6, 2008 - 3:31:15 AM
The Bush Administration Missile Defence ****eld is not to protect
against Iran, but to seal U.S. military hegemony over Russia, Putin
will go to any length to stop it, writes Liam Bailey.
As U.S. President Bush meets with President Putin in Russia in an
attempt to repair relations between the two countries, after Bush's
plans to put a radar guided missile system in two soviet satellite
states has took us far too close to another cold-war scenario, I want
to make my feelings on the matter clear.
The mainstream media, when it does mention the chances of a US attack
on Iran, fails to mention the likelihood of China and Russia backing
Iran directly. But as tensions continue to mount between Bush and
Putin, on top of the struggle for control of the world's remaining
resources turned violent by the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and
Iraq, I have become almost certain that, if the U.S. and/or Israel
attack Iran, China and Russia are almost certain to take action in
defence of Iran.
As all analysts state the Bush-Putin meeting will come nowhere close
to resolving their differences I am going to go one step further and
say these differences won't be resolved because Bush doesn't want them
to be.
Bush is the biggest megalomaniac to ever inhabit the White House, his
invasions of two countries, both of which he thought would be quick
wars shows his overblown opinion of U.S. military strength. Plans for
a Missile ****eld are not to protect against Iran, as Bush claims but
to ensure U.S. supremacy over Russia in preparation for the scrap over
resources, a move he thought Russia wouldn't dare challenge, but
instead it is a move Russia will go to any length to prevent.
Putin has recently said that not only is Russia maintaining its
nuclear capability but further developing it, and also reiterated a
threat that he would re-targeted Russia's nuclear arsenal on Europe
for the first time since the Cold War.
Putin has also warned that any expansion of the North American Treaty
Organisation will be seen as an act of aggression.
At the recent meeting Bush failed to secure NATO entry for Georgia and
Ukraine, and said he will keep trying, I am not sure if their entry
will receive Putin's stamp as an aggressive act, but the Missile
****eld is firmly in there on the aggression stakes, mind you
retargeting nuclear arsenals isn't exactly pacifism.
I am genuinely worried. As the Iran nuclear crisis hanging over Israel
continues to damage Jewish migration to the fatherland, and the Arab/
Jew ratio continues to increase the chances of Israel losing its
Jewish predominance, it becomes almost certain that Israel will launch
a first-strike against the Iran nuclear program, and they are most
likely to do it before Bush leaves office.
If Israel does attack first, they will probably use tactical-nuclear
"Bunker Busting" bombs, to ensure destruction of Iran's nuclear
facilities, which are deep-underground. The U.S. will be informed of
Israel's desperation to launch the attack, and in all likelihood they
won't stop them, worst case scenario they will help them, absolute
worst-case scenario, Russia and China launch a counter attack and
World War III erupts.
I will catch flak here for what can be called blatant speculation, but
no one can say what I have laid out above is impossible, and like I
said; I am genuinely worried.
Liam Bailey is a U.K. based journalist and publisher of War Pages and
The Bailey Mail .
http://www.garoweonline.com
|
