Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Peace > Re: John Bolton...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 9 Topic 6006 of 6231
Post > Topic >>

Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl

by Greg Procter <procter@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 01:23 PM

veritas wrote:
> 
> On May 11, 8:16 pm, Greg Procter <proc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > veritas wrote:
> >
> > > On May 11, 4:25 pm, Greg Procter <proc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > veritas wrote:
> >
> > > > > On May 6, 1:40 pm, Reggie <Reggie...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > Latest News-at-a-Glance  - Courtesy of 
TvNewsLIES.orghttp://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/latest-news-at-a-glance
> > > > > >
___________________________________________________________________________­­­_____
> > > > > > John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps
> > > > > > Tuesday, 06 May 2008 14:25
> >
> > > > > > Mr Bolton said that striking Iran would represent a major step
towards
> > > > > > victory in Iraq. While he acknowledged that the risk of a
hostile
> > > > > > Iranian response harming American’s overseas interests
existed, he said
> > > > > > the damage inflicted by Tehran would be “far higher” if
Wa****ngton took
> > > > > > no action.
> >
> > > > > > “This is a case where the use of military force against a
training camp
> > > > > > to show the Iranians we’re not going to tolerate this is
really the most
> > > > > > prudent thing to do,” he said. “Then the ball would be in
Iran’s court
> > > > > > to draw the appropriate lesson to stop harming our troops.”
> >
> > > > > > More...
> > > > > >
___________________________________________________________________________­­­____
> > > > > > Inquiry: Hospitals couldn't handle terror attack
> > > > > > Tuesday, 06 May 2008 13:29
> >
> > > > > > WA****NGTON — Hospital trauma centers in seven major cities do
not have
> > > > > > the capacity to handle even a modest terrorist attack,
according to
> > > > > > findings released Monday from a House committee investigation.
> >
> > > > > > Lawmakers looked into hospitals' ability to deal with a sudden
influx of
> > > > > > victims in the five cities considered at highest risk for
terrorist
> > > > > > attack and in the two cities hosting this summer's political
conventions.
> >
> > > > > > More...
> > > > > >
___________________________________________________________________________­­­___
> > > > > > House panel subpoenas top Cheney aide
> > > > > > Tuesday, 06 May 2008 13:19
> >
> > > > > > WA****NGTON (AP) — The House Judiciary Committee voted Tuesday
to compel
> > > > > > a top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney to testify to the
committee
> > > > > > about the Bush administration's interrogation practices.
> >
> > > > > > David Addington, Cheney's chief of staff, refused to testify
without a
> > > > > > subpoena. No date has been set for his appearance before
Congress.
> >
> > > > > > Addington is one of several lawyers believed to have played a
key role
> > > > > > in crafting the administration's interrogation policies
shortly after
> > > > > > the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, policies which some say
amounted to torture.
> >
> > > > > > More...
> > > > > >
___________________________________________________________________________­­­___
> > > > > > Guantánamo Briton sues UK over 'torture evidence'
> > > > > > Tuesday, 06 May 2008 12:49
> >
> > > > > > The last British resident left in Guantánamo Bay is suing the
UK
> > > > > > government for refusing to produce evidence that he was a
victim of
> > > > > > extraordinary rendition and torture.
> >
> > > > > > Binyam Mohamed faces a US military commission which could
sentence him
> > > > > > to death, and his lawyers say proving that the case against
him is based
> > > > > > exclusively on evidence extracted by torture, following his
rendition by
> > > > > > the CIA, is vital to his defence.
> >
> > > > > > Today, they lodged papers at the high court in London, seeking
a
> > > > > > judicial review to force the Foreign Office to release
information on
> > > > > > his movements.
> >
> > > > > > More...
> > > > > >
___________________________________________________________________________­­­____
> > > > > > Fuelling the world food crisis
> > > > > > Tuesday, 06 May 2008 12:39
> >
> > > > > > Yesterday’s Wa****ngton Post front-page lead story summed up in
seven
> > > > > > words what’s going on: "Siphoning Off Corn to Fuel Our Cars."
> >
> > > > > > Yes, cars on American roads will burn up close to one-third of
the
> > > > > > enormous corn crop American farmers will grow this year. But
because the
> > > > > > United States is the world’s biggest producer of corn, an
essential
> > > > > > staple, this massive diversion from the food bowl to the fuel
tank
> > > > > > threatens to wreak increasing havoc from here to Timbuktu.
> >
> > > > > > More...
> > > > > >
___________________________________________________________________________­­­____
> >
> > > > > > News updated throughout the day.  http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl
> >
> > > > > Well, then Timbuktu will have to pay more for the corn than the
fuel
> > > > > people.  Ecomomics
> > > > > at work.  Then maybe oil will go down under a $100.00/barrel. 
They
> > > > > can't eat oil.  Well,
> > > > > maybe they can in Timbuktu, but not the middle east.   Ken Hogan
> >
> > > > If "economics" in the sense of "free enterprise economoics" made
sense,
> > > > oil would be $300- per barrel and rising.
> >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Greg.P.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > Economics of "free enterprise economics" is all that works.  As for
> > > $300 a barrel of oil.
> > > So what?  It costs us a 1/4 of one cent to print a dollar bill.
> > > Figure out the math.  We
> > > get a barrel of oil and they get .75/cents of paper.  Meanwhile our
> > > ex****ts are going full blast and we bought the barrel of oil for .75
> > > cents.  So, let it raise.  If they don't want to sell it anymore,
they
> > > are on their own.  Let them eat the oil.  Or we just come take it.
> > > Either way, we get the oil and to our advantage.
> >
> > > --
> > > Ken Hogan
> >
> > Hi Ken,
> >
> > it doesn't work that way - if you print more money your economy
remains
> > the same value so the value of the US dollar drops. (that has a
familiar
> > ring to it)
> > You get one ****pment of oil and then you pay in Euros thereafter. You
> > produce bugger-all that the world wants so you have no Euros.
> > The price of oil goes up until demand begins to droop. The oil
producing
> > countries have finally realized that their resources are worth more
than
> > the US wants to pay and that it doesn't matter how much they charge
> > because we will pay it.
> > Your invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq has shown your military threat
is
> > next to toothless.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Greg.P.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> There are not enough Euros in the world to take care of all the
> economic transactions tht go on every day.

AFAIK the number of US$ and Euros are close to equal.

> The Euros would have run-
> away inflation if they printed or stamped all that money.  

Certainly - exactly the same as if you printed excess US dollars.

> There are a
> lot of bodies in Afghanistan, and Iraq buried in the sand with no
> teeth marks I guess. 

sure - we don't hold either the US or it's former ally Saddam Hussein in
any high regard.


> not many are ours. 

Not enough - I just wish you would get what you deserve. (well, not
really, that would be an awful lot of innocent yanks slaughtered!

> Just remember, we didn't use
> all we had, we used what we felt was necessary. 

You've used more than you've got, that's why your currency is taking
it's current decline.

> If we were like the
> muslims, they all would be under the sand if we chose. 

The only difference between you and "the Muslims"  is that they
generally want peace - you want to continue to steal their resources.

> We chose not
> to.  We wouldn't even break a sweat.  That's called winning hearts and
> minds, wait until we don't give a damn about winning hearts and minds,
> then we just take them all.  

If you did that you would be the pariah of the planet - trade would end
with you and you'd be isolatedand on a par with Myanmar.

> So don't get to mouthy, we aren't done
> yet.  We don't have 4 carrier groups in the Indian Ocean for the fine
> weather.

LOL,  you can't even subdue minor countries of peasants in black pajamas
carrying bamboo sticks, let alone two stoneage ME nations, how do you
imagine you'd subdue the entire Muslim world?
> 
> Regards.
> Ken Hogan
 




 9 Posts in Topic:
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
veritas <khogantwo@[EM  2008-05-11 00:24:20 
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
Greg Procter <procter@  2008-05-12 09:25:17 
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
veritas <khogantwo@[EM  2008-05-11 17:28:31 
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
Greg Procter <procter@  2008-05-12 13:16:18 
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
veritas <khogantwo@[EM  2008-05-12 17:47:04 
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
Greg Procter <procter@  2008-05-13 13:23:05 
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
veritas <khogantwo@[EM  2008-05-13 12:36:37 
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
Greg Procter <procter@  2008-05-14 12:31:14 
Re: John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps - tvnl
veritas <khogantwo@[EM  2008-05-13 19:06:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 9:47:50 CST 2008.