Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Peace > Re: possibly OT...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 25 Topic 6095 of 6231
Post > Topic >>

Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really true....?

by "Katt" <kahgfghttt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 13, 2008 at 05:56 AM

"thomas p." <gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:48a1e248$0

> One observation about the above.   The US, just like any other nation,
is 
> far from perfect, but there is no reason to make up claims such as:  "no

> fewer than *133* have a US military presence -- which, in each and every

> case, the population was not consulted about; did
> not vote for; and cannot choose to remove..."  Almost all of the nations

> he mentioned are functioning democracies.  The freely elected
governments 
> have the right to cancel agreements with the US.
>

Ludicrous post. 'The freely elected governments have the right to cancel 
agreements with the US' is, in this context, the stupidest, most 
historically uninformed, most politically deluded statement I have read in

months.

K.
 




 25 Posts in Topic:
possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really true
"Katt" <kahg  2008-07-23 18:10:36 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Bill M" <wm  2008-07-23 14:46:22 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
hralistserve <alan_tru  2008-09-06 10:38:56 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"GordHnotGordB"  2008-09-06 20:06:07 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
patpowersspam@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-07 01:06:58 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Paul Treadaway <paul.t  2008-07-23 20:41:44 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-07-23 16:53:35 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
patmpowers@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-23 17:05:17 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-07-23 20:06:49 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
The World Wide Wade <a  2008-07-25 17:22:37 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-07-24 03:19:07 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Dogmantic Pyrrhonis  2008-07-23 20:25:43 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Greg Procter <procter@  2008-07-24 16:17:35 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-08-12 08:35:22 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"thomas p." <  2008-08-12 21:19:38 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Katt" <kahg  2008-08-13 05:56:06 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"thomas p." <  2008-08-13 07:22:46 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Katt" <kahg  2008-08-13 13:54:48 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"thomas p." <  2008-08-13 17:28:57 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Tim Ward" <  2008-08-13 16:31:16 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-08-21 21:31:17 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"thomas p." <  2008-08-22 08:30:11 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-09-19 14:35:49 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
patpowersspam@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-07 01:07:52 
Believe...
neo <TheNeo@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-19 15:24:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 13:56:47 CST 2008.