Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Peace > Re: possibly OT...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 24 of 25 Topic 6095 of 6231
Post > Topic >>

Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really

by patpowersspam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sep 7, 2008 at 01:07 AM

On Aug 22, 1:30=A0pm, "thomas p." <gudl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "stoney" <sto...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i en
meddelelsenews:p7gsa419cpa6h0qss8d48=
oemeuok53s93l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:19:38 +0200, "thomas p." <gudl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > Message ID: <48a1e248$0$56773$edfad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> > alt.atheism;
>
> >>"stoney" <sto...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i en meddelelse
> >>news:o6b3a41h8q3hcsgejm1e150idqq402ptgo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:19:07 GMT, Douglas Berry
> >>> <penguin_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Message ID:
> >>> <nlsf84drq43rhs9qgnhdqo74745scpq...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in alt.atheism;
>
> >>>>On =A0Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:10:36 +0100 "Katt" <kahgfgh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
carve=
d
> >>>>the following into the hard stone of alt.atheism
> >>>>>Saw this somewhere and wondered if it's actually accurate...
> >>>>>-----
> >>>>>"Wa****ngton and its apologists continually insist that the US is
'no=
t
> >>>>>an
> >>>>>imperial power'. Yet of the 192 supposedly 'sovereign' states
> >>>>>recognised
> >>>>>by
> >>>>>the United Nations, no fewer than *133* have a US military presence
=
--
> >>>>>which, in each and every case, the population was not consulted
abou=
t;
> >>>>>did
> >>>>>not vote for; and cannot choose to remove..."
>
> >>>>Define "military presence" Does this count USMC Embassy Guards? The
U=
S
> >>>>Navy weather stations in Greenland? Two field grade officers and a
> >>>>small staff posted to Outer Wayouttherestan to train locals on the
> >>>>equipment their government has bought? How about US troops taking
par=
t
> >>>>in UN or NATO missions? Troops get around, and some of these
presence=
s
> >>>>are as simple as US troops attending training in a nation.
>
> >>>>Oh, a short list of nations having a military presence in the US:
>
> >>>>Germany.
> >>>>Canada.
> >>>>The United Kingdom.
> >>>>Japan.
> >>>>Saudi Arabia.
> >>>>Jordan.
> >>>>Egypt.
> >>>>Republic of Korea.
>
> >>>>All these have a significant number of troops assigned inside the US
> >>>>at any given time. Germany maintains an entire Luftwaffe squadron at
> >>>>Holloman AFB for training
>
> >>> George AFB in Victorville, CA., had a full Luftwaffe squadron for
> >>> training until it closed. =A0Americans did all the maintenance.
=A0Al=
though
> >>> I was in the other wing, I was asked to install an advanced comm
syst=
em
> >>> on their flightline and sit in on their TCTO {Time Compliance
Technic=
al
> >>> Order {{system maintenance modification meetings}}
>
> >>(piggybacking here)
> >>One observation about the above. =A0 The US, just like any other
nation=
, is
> >>far from perfect, but there is no reason to make up claims such as:
=A0=
"no
> >>fewer than *133* have a US military presence -- which, in each and
ever=
y
> >>case, the population was not consulted about; did
> >>not vote for; and cannot choose to remove..." =A0Almost all of the
nati=
ons
> >>he
> >>mentioned are functioning democracies. =A0The freely elected
government=
s
> >>have
> >>the right to cancel agreements with the US.
>
> > Since when do facts matter to blatherers?
>
> For a long time I have had the feeling that most people have a set of
> doctrines secular or religious, and they will not or are not able to
> tolerate anything that calls them into question. =A0Perhaps all of us
are=
 like
> that to a lesser or greater degree.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I put it more simply as "Most people believe what they want to
believe."  Reading Usenet has convinced me of this.
 




 25 Posts in Topic:
possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really true
"Katt" <kahg  2008-07-23 18:10:36 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Bill M" <wm  2008-07-23 14:46:22 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
hralistserve <alan_tru  2008-09-06 10:38:56 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"GordHnotGordB"  2008-09-06 20:06:07 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
patpowersspam@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-07 01:06:58 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Paul Treadaway <paul.t  2008-07-23 20:41:44 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-07-23 16:53:35 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
patmpowers@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-23 17:05:17 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-07-23 20:06:49 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
The World Wide Wade <a  2008-07-25 17:22:37 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-07-24 03:19:07 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Dogmantic Pyrrhonis  2008-07-23 20:25:43 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
Greg Procter <procter@  2008-07-24 16:17:35 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-08-12 08:35:22 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"thomas p." <  2008-08-12 21:19:38 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Katt" <kahg  2008-08-13 05:56:06 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"thomas p." <  2008-08-13 07:22:46 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Katt" <kahg  2008-08-13 13:54:48 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"thomas p." <  2008-08-13 17:28:57 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"Tim Ward" <  2008-08-13 16:31:16 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-08-21 21:31:17 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
"thomas p." <  2008-08-22 08:30:11 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
stoney <stoney@[EMAIL   2008-09-19 14:35:49 
Re: possibly OT... US forces around the world... Is this really
patpowersspam@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-07 01:07:52 
Believe...
neo <TheNeo@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-19 15:24:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 13:33:39 CST 2008.