Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Polamory > Re: FCC Enforce...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 3008 of 3285
Post > Topic >>

Re: FCC Enforcement on Policy...Why Not.

by Tootsie Toodie <tootsie.toodie@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 13, 2008 at 07:32 PM

On Apr 13, 8:20=EF=BF=BDam, Popeye <konst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license N9OGL; WARNING NOTICE; Case #EB-07-
> SE-371
>
> Dear Mr. Daugherty:
>
> The information before the Commission indicates that you are operating
> an unlicensed radio station on, among other frequencies, 6.950 and
> 13.556 MHz. The information indicates that the signal strength of
> these transmissions exceed the power limit of Part 15 of the
> Commission's rules for unlicensed transmitters. That limit is 30uV/M
> at 30 Meters." The letter also stated that "Commission radio direction
> finding signals indicate that such transmissions were made from your
> location on 13.556 MHz at various dates in November 2006. This
> information raises serious questions regarding your qualifications to
> retain an Amateur license." The FCC gave Dougherty 20 days to answer 8
> questions regarding his operating practices, including wanting to know
> if he has used the name Todd O'Dochartaigh, N9OGL, and if so, asked
> him to describe the cir***stances under which he used it and the
> dates. Dougherty was warned that the FCC "will use all relevant
> information before it, including information that you disclose in your
> reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is warranted in
> this matter. Such action may include license revocation, suspension of
> your operator privileges or monetary forfeiture (fine). Fines normally
> range from $7500 to $10,000."
>
> SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license N9OGL; WARNING NOTICE; Case #EB-07-
> SE-371
>
> Dear Mr. Daugherty:
>
> Your response to the Enforcement Bureau received on November 6, 2007
> was insufficient and contradictory, and indicates a misunderstanding
> of the Part 15 power limits for unlicensed stations. For example, you
> stated that your power levels were in compliance with Part 15 of the
> Commission's rules, yet in statements made in 2006 and 2007 describing
> your shortwave station "Omega One" you stated that you were operating
> at 5 watts, then 10 watts and later 50 and 100 watts. =EF=BF=BDSuch
unlice=
nsed
> operation would be a violation of Section 301 of the Communications
> Act of 1934, as amended, 18 U.S.C. S: 301, and would =EF=BF=BDsubject
you =
to a
> monetary forfeiture (fine) or imprisonment, or both. Forfeitures
> normally range from $7,500 to $10,000. Furthermore, such operation
> would reflect adversely on your qualifications to retain an Amateur
> license.
pay attention marqueer.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: FCC Enforcement on Policy...Why Not.
Tootsie Toodie <tootsi  2008-04-13 19:32:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 22:03:06 CDT 2008.