On Apr 13, 7:32=C2=A0pm, Tootsie Toodie <tootsie.too...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 8:20=EF=BF=BDam, Popeye <konst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license N9OGL; WARNING NOTICE; Case #EB-07-
> > SE-371
>
> > Dear Mr. Daugherty:
>
> > The information before the Commission indicates that you are operating
> > an unlicensed radio station on, among other frequencies, 6.950 and
> > 13.556 MHz. The information indicates that the signal strength of
> > these transmissions exceed the power limit of Part 15 of the
> > Commission's rules for unlicensed transmitters. That limit is 30uV/M
> > at 30 Meters." The letter also stated that "Commission radio direction
> > finding signals indicate that such transmissions were made from your
> > location on 13.556 MHz at various dates in November 2006. This
> > information raises serious questions regarding your qualifications to
> > retain an Amateur license." The FCC gave Dougherty 20 days to answer 8
> > questions regarding his operating practices, including wanting to know
> > if he has used the name Todd O'Dochartaigh, N9OGL, and if so, asked
> > him to describe the circumstances under which he used it and the
> > dates. Dougherty was warned that the FCC "will use all relevant
> > information before it, including information that you disclose in your
> > reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is warranted in
> > this matter. Such action may include license revocation, suspension of
> > your operator privileges or monetary forfeiture (fine). Fines normally
> > range from $7500 to $10,000."
>
> > SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license N9OGL; WARNING NOTICE; Case #EB-07-
> > SE-371
>
> > Dear Mr. Daugherty:
>
> > Your response to the Enforcement Bureau received on November 6, 2007
> > was insufficient and contradictory, and indicates a misunderstanding
> > of the Part 15 power limits for unlicensed stations. For example, you
> > stated that your power levels were in compliance with Part 15 of the
> > Commission's rules, yet in statements made in 2006 and 2007 describing
> > your shortwave station "Omega One" you stated that you were operating
> > at 5 watts, then 10 watts and later 50 and 100 watts. =EF=BF=BDSuch
unli=
censed
> > operation would be a violation of Section 301 of the Communications
> > Act of 1934, as amended, 18 U.S.C. S: 301, and would =EF=BF=BDsubject
yo=
u to a
> > monetary forfeiture (fine) or imprisonment, or both. Forfeitures
> > normally range from $7,500 to $10,000. Furthermore, such operation
> > would reflect adversely on your qualifications to retain an Amateur
> > license.
>
> pay attention marqueer.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
YEAH MARK PAY ATTENTION TO THE AIDS INFESTED QUEERS
|
