On Apr 15, 8:26=A0am, David <farook...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:45:41 -0700 (PDT), Zee <jonZ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> typed furiously:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 14, 5:15=A0pm, David <farook...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:38:53 -0700 (PDT), Zee <jonZ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> typed furiously:
>
> >> >On Apr 14, 12:23=A0pm, good...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >> Rape is rape. =A0*** is ***. =A0Age doesn't matter. =A0The state
doe=
sn't
> >> >> have to recognize marriage until it wants to. =A0All the girls
shoul=
d be
> >> >> given birth control options, and information on a way out, to call
a=
> >> >> number, that they will have room and board off the compound so
they
> >> >> can get an education and get jobs. =A0Some of the girls may
actively=
> >> >> consent and love their husbands. =A0They may want to live on the
> >> >> compound in their society and raise children. =A0They should only
be=
> >> >> moved away if that is what they want.
>
> >> >> The only crime that should be prosecuted is actual rape - and that
i=
s,
> >> >> only if the victims - the minors themselves - _want_ to press
charge=
s
> >> >> of rape. =A0Anything else is tyranny, wrong and evil.
>
> >> >you are talkin a perfect world...the cult advocates multible wives
for=
> >> >men....hey thats a no no.....jz
>
> >> Why?
> >> --
> >> Regards
> >> David
> >> fundamentalism (n.): fund =3D give cash to; amentalism =3D
brainlessnes=
s- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >it comes from the Christian Bible ...why do the Indians not permit
> >it....hindu...huh....the old testament speaks of marriage and being
> >faithful to that one person and of course the ten commandments speaks
> >of adultery as being a no no...and fornication is also a no no =A0..per
> >the seven deadly sins....jz.
>
> The old testament does speak of marriage, but it doesn't mention being
> faithful to one person. King Solomon is reputed to have over six
> hundred wives and numerous concubines. That is not marriage of one man
> and one woman.
>
> The innovation of having just a single spouse was introduced by the
> Catholic church to combat the (supposed) licentiousness of the pagan
> festivals, eg Midsummer, midwinter, the solstices and harvest and
> fertility festivals. It has, resulted in the slowing of the diversity
> of the gene pool and probably the rise in genetic flaws.
> --
> Regards
> David
> fundamentalism (n.): fund =3D give cash to; amentalism =3D
brainlessness- =
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
well i understand the adultery part of the ten commandments as meaning
the two partners of a marriage ....a loving couple would not be
considered adultery rather fornication.....i suppose the Bible does
allow for a nay or yay on all things....that is human ...huh...jz
|
