by stef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Stef)
May 3, 2008 at 10:38 PM
In article
<35bdc1de-6e33-4147-8ee1-3581c497cd30@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
odessa34668 <odessa34668@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Apr 29, 1:58 am, s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Stef) wrote:
>> There are probably some on the Poly Friendly Professionals list who
will
>> work by phone. I don't know whether that would be better than the 3-4
>> hour trek.
>I belive face to face is needed in her case (avoidance issues) and
>time is a major factor so the trek to tampa is not realistic. Thanks
>for responding.
I've been to several relation****p counselors, and only one of them was
explicitly poly-friendly. The others I interviewed by phone. "We are
poly [*insert explanation here*] and that's not the source of our
relation****p problem. Are you willing to work with us under the
assumption that poly is a reasonable way to run a relation****p?" They
said yes and it turned out to be true.
--
Stef ** stef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
** cat-and-dragon.com/stef ** firecat.livejournal.com **
**
Yet another person who needs at least a Kinsey cube, and possibly a
Kinsey Klein Bottle, to map zir ***ual orientation. -- SJM
