Re: hi from Idaho

In article <dobd84ds3nngg8osocrtulma79m6m38433@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 David <farookdas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:33:23 +1200, Miche <micheinnz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> typed furiously:
> 
> >In article <pfnc841rihg2j3fltdhlta5ks0bottuss9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > David <farookdas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:37:48 -0700, Serene Vannoy
> >> <serene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> typed furiously:
> >> 
> >> >anarii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >> >> On Jul 21, 10:36 pm, Serene Vannoy <ser...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >>> nipolycouple wrote:
> >> >>>> Thanks for telling me that it can work.
> >> >>>> We were told all through our lives that you had to be monogomous
and
> >> >>>> it really never made sence.  There are billions of people out
there
> >> >>>> and you are only allowed to love one?
> >> >>> Yeah, that's not the way I work. I know there are people who are
> >> >>> perfectly happy loving one person at a time, and who never fall
in love
> >> >>> with a new person when they already have a partner. I'm just not
one of
> >> >>> them.
> >> >
> >> >> I'm still trying to figure out why everyone seems to be ok with
> >> >> cheating.
> >> >
> >> >I don't think everyone is.  I do think that some people seem to
prefer 
> >> >the idea of cheating to the idea of poly, and my theory is that the
idea 
> >> >of being open about having multiple lovers scares them.
> >
> >> Unfortunately years of religious brainwa****ng are very difficult to
> >> throw off.
> >
> >Religion need not come into it.  
> 
> While you may not be religious the notion that you must be monogamous
> has been foisted on us by religion.

All religions?  Or are you using "religion" as secret ant-talk for 
Christianity?

Miche

-- 
Electricians do it in three phases