On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:08:41 -0700, in alt.astrology,
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:77b7m11d7rauhqa9ncgfkbcgjkh46pv5j3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:45:17 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>> "KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:21:27 -0400, "Lambdascorpii"
>>><lambdascorpii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I don't give a ****...
>>>
>>>
>>>Uh....Then why did you post a reply to a message subject that you
>>>don't care about.
>>>
>>>Seems kinda silly.
>>
>> He believes in astrology...
>> that sort of fits the mold
>> Which He has built for himself
>
>Do you think astrology doesn't work?
I know it doesn't work. just like magic doesn't work, the bread doesn't
really turn into meat, and the wine doesn't really turn into blood in the
rite of ritual canabilism/vampirism practiced in most christian churches.
Magic doesn't exist, their are no fairies, aliens in UFOs, LGMs, gods or
goddesses.
Astrology, the superstition is based on Apophenia... It is an artifact of
the way the human brain works. The human brain tries to make patterned
where
they are no pattern. Also if you are into ready, study what a type one
statistical error is. The best pro astrology arguments to come up in years
was based upon the so called mars effect, which was accomplished by the
cherry picking of data. When the so called mars effect is looked at in the
general population, the tendency disappears. Just as every over so called
astrological trait, disappears or appears uniformally in every sign, with
an
equal or nearly equal distribution.
In others words, astrology is a superstition, based on the ancient art of
calendar keeping by a small religious body, based in the middle east about
or before 3400 BC., a modern belief not based in facts or science, but in
disproved facts and a belief in idle speculation.
--
Ak'toh'di
|
