On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:32:04 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha Man"
<nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the subservient, microcephalous
>hooligan, and starcher of ****rt collars, pealed:
>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 05:48:57 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
>> Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the fringed, smoke-cured
>>> puddle of puke, and dealer in stale cheeses, whinnied:
>>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 05:07:40 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
>>>> Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the suppositional,
>>>>> tape-recorded hairy tongue, and seller of dead eels, moaned:
>>>>>
>>>>>> the wine doesn't really turn into
>>>>>> blood in the rite of ritual canabilism/vampirism practiced in most
>>>>>> christian churches.
>>>>>
>>>>> Correction, Bob. That is not the view of 'most christian churches'.
>>>>> It is only the Roman Catholic Cult that promotes such a heinous
>>>>> lie.
>>>>
>>>> In this case, I will use a broad brush, if it suits me to make
>>>> people think...
>>>>
>>>> I heard/joined in a discussion with a fundy baptist minister a few
>>>> years ago talking... he didn't believe the unlevened bread meant for
>>>> 'Chag Ha-Matzot' offering literally became the body of christ, but
>>>> figuratively or symbolistic of the body of christ. Of course you
>>>> [the baptist minister didn't] understand the roots of this ritual
>>>> come from two different old hebrew celebrations? Chag-Ha-Pesach,
>>>> meaning the "Festival of the Pesach" (festival of the lamb) in
>>>> Hebrew, and the second festival was known as Chag Ha-Matzot
>>>> (festival of the unlevened bread) both have their root in the
>>>> ancient city of Ar and trying to trace their root back farther
>>>> seems to be like sifting dust
>>>>
>>>> Even in this, the mother church <which it isn't> seems to start
>>>> talking about the bible not really being the 'word' of god, and
>>>> maybe they'll decide the pope isn't infallible...
>>>>
>>>> The old church is the foundation which all the fundies beliefs are
>>>> built upon. When the walls come tumbling down, so will they rhetoric
>>>> the fundies have espoused for years.
>>>>
>>>> If there was/is no god, some people will still try to create him in
>>>> their image.
>>>>
>>>> I know Grandmother Selu will get me for that...
>>>
>>> Nice rant, Bob. How long have you been a closet frothing and
>>> foaming, lying, anti-religious zealot? Hmmm? You are no better than
>>> those whom you accuse.
>>
>> What part was rant?
>
>The lot of it.
You have to be more specific...
>> what part was a lie?
>
>The part I asked you to sup****t with argument and/or evidence, for
starters.
Did you read about or are you familiar with the histories of the era and
area I cited... if not you don't have the background to take part in the
discussion. Without basic understanding of history and sociological
background, I would be wasting my time. I am not in the mood to humor
people
that haven't studied history or sociology when dealing with religious
debate.
>> what part was frothing/foaming?
>
>The lot of it.
I didn't think so.
>> You do understand christianity has it roots built in both the
>> religion of the hebrews and various other pagan religions in europe
>> in 100AD... And the old hebrew religion was based on a cult in the
>> city of AR... (that's where abraham and Sarah was from)
>
>There you go making more unsup****ted claims; putting more nails into the
>hands that will hammer down your coffin lid.
Actually it is sup****ted 100%...
But you haven't studied history it seems you wouldn't even be asking
questions.
>>>> The old church is the foundation which all the fundies beliefs are
>>>> built upon.
>>>
>>> I say you are a bare-faced, frothing liar. Sup****t your claim that
>>> "The old church is the foundation which all the fundies beliefs are
>>> built upon" with argument and/or evidence.
>>
>> Take the time to read up the state of the church and John Calvin...
>> and then go back and study the history from around 200-325 AD
>> including the history of the Council of Nicene, the beliefs and
>> writing of Arius, Presbyter in Alexandria, and Eusebius, Bishop of
>> Nicomedia. Also do a little reading on the Arian Controversy.
>
>Ah, so you make claims that you cannot sup****t and when pushed to sup****t
>them, you tell people to go and study this, study that and study the
other,
>under the ridiculous and mistaken assumption that the other person will
come
>to the exact same conclusioon that you did. Very k0^hclever, Bob.
No, I really don't have time to waste with someone that doesn't have any
of
the basic knowledge to begin with...
>A) Always believe that only you know the TRVTH.
No, I know I am not the only person that knows the Trvth. Hell I don't
think
the Trvth exists.
>B) Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
It hasn't stopped you.
>C) Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if they
>approve the drivel you are writing!
Who have I quoted beside went I suggested you take the time to read
Calvin's
writings... Prior to studying about the era of 325 and event leading up
to
and following the Council of Nicene
>D) Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the more
>likely others will believe you!
Not really I don't care one wit... But liked I said education yourself.
>E) When responding to one line challenges, post paragraphs of rants and
>screed in response.
One just respond with one line taunts...
>F) Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting.
I doesn't stop you does it.
>G) Neither is illiteracy.
I guess you don't read much...
>H) Delusions poasted often enough become fact.
I guess that is what you are shooting for.
>I) Always accuse others of the very acts you are guilty of.
That what you entire article was about...
>hahaha.
>
>J) Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not
>require proof.
While I don't have proof I can point to others work which sup****t my
claims.
>haha.
>
>K) K00ks LOVE to "connect the dots". They are, of course, dots that only
the
>k00k can see.
>
>http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
That looks like it was started from the old KOOK FAQ which Lou used to
keep
on his page.
>>>> In this case, I will use a broad brush, if it suits me to make
>>>> people think...
>>>
>>> You might not have caught the attention of my k0oK detector had you
>>> thought before you frothed and foamed your rabid hatred all over the
>>> place, Bob.
>>
>> Then your detector must be broken or it would be going off every time
>> you walked into the room.
>
>Wow, Bob! An IKYABWAI lame. What next, 'your mother' lames?
No, I'll leave that for you.
>I say you are showing the signs of being a rabid k0oK, no matter how hard
>you try to ingratiate yourself with others.
Can a laugh at you, now...
|
