Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Dr. Turi > Re: NO ONE WILL...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 53 Topic 686 of 807
Post > Topic >>

Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI

by "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 30, 2005 at 08:10 AM

Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the incessant, senseless gasblower,
and well digger, inculcated:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:32:04 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
> Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the subservient,
>> microcephalous hooligan, and starcher of ****rt collars, pealed:
>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 05:48:57 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
>>> Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the fringed, smoke-cured
>>>> puddle of puke, and dealer in stale cheeses, whinnied:
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 05:07:40 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the suppositional,
>>>>>> tape-recorded hairy tongue, and seller of dead eels, moaned:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the wine doesn't really turn into
>>>>>>> blood in the rite of ritual canabilism/vampirism practiced in
>>>>>>> most christian churches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Correction, Bob. That is not the view of 'most christian
>>>>>> churches'. It is only the Roman Catholic Cult that promotes such
>>>>>> a heinous lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case, I will use a broad brush, if it suits me to make
>>>>> people think...
>>>>>
>>>>> I heard/joined in a discussion with a fundy baptist minister a few
>>>>> years ago talking... he didn't believe the unlevened bread meant
>>>>> for 'Chag Ha-Matzot' offering literally became the body of
>>>>> christ, but figuratively or symbolistic of the body of christ. Of
>>>>> course you [the baptist minister didn't] understand the roots of
>>>>> this ritual come from two different old hebrew celebrations?
>>>>> Chag-Ha-Pesach, meaning the "Festival of the Pesach" (festival of
>>>>> the lamb) in Hebrew, and the second festival was known as Chag
>>>>> Ha-Matzot (festival of the unlevened bread) both have their root
>>>>> in the ancient city of Ar and trying to trace their root back
>>>>> farther seems to be like sifting dust
>>>>>
>>>>> Even in this, the mother church <which it isn't> seems to start
>>>>> talking about the bible not really being the 'word' of god, and
>>>>> maybe they'll decide the pope isn't infallible...
>>>>>
>>>>> The old church is the foundation which all the fundies beliefs are
>>>>> built upon. When the walls come tumbling down, so will they
>>>>> rhetoric the fundies have espoused for years.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there was/is no god, some people will still try to create him
>>>>> in their image.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know Grandmother Selu will get me for that...
>>>>
>>>> Nice rant, Bob. How long have you been a closet frothing and
>>>> foaming, lying, anti-religious zealot? Hmmm? You are no better than
>>>> those whom you accuse.
>>>
>>> What part was rant?
>>
>> The lot of it.
>
> You have to be more specific...

There is no need to be more specific. You were already explicitly asked to

sup****t just one of your claims, which you have so far spectacularly
failed 
to do. There's no point focusing your myopic mind on the bigger picture if

you can't even see the little pictures. You may wish to engage yourself in

sheer futility but normal people recognise it and avoid it.

>>> what part was a lie?
>>
>> The part I asked you to sup****t with argument and/or evidence, for
>> starters.
>
> Did you read about or are you familiar with

There you again. You cannot sup****t your claim so when pushed to sup****t
it, you ask people if they have studied this, that or the other.

How strange that you should do it yet again, even after being told, point 
blank, that you are behaving like a k0oK when you operate under the 
ridiculous and mistaken assumption that the other person will come to the 
exact same conclusion that you did.

> Did you read about or are you familiar with the histories of the era
> and area I cited... if not you don't have the background to take part
> in the discussion. Without basic understanding of history and
> sociological background, I would be wasting my time. I am not in the
> mood to humor people that haven't studied history or sociology when
> dealing with religious debate.


You have exposed your thin hide. If I was not up to the task of tearing
your
statement into little pieces and showing you to be the foaming fool that
you
are then this would not have transpired:

>> The old church is the foundation which all the fundies beliefs
>> are built upon.

> I say you are a bare-faced, frothing liar. Sup****t your claim that
> "The old church is the foundation which all the fundies beliefs are
> built upon" with argument and/or evidence.

Read this good and hard, netk0oK:

I do not have to establish my credentials to argue against your wild and 
unsup****ted claims. You have to establish your claim as valid. Pointing at

books and history to make the argument is the way of the k0oK.

You have made a claim and you have been accused of being a closet k0oK.
Your
failure to offer any kind of sup****t and your eagerness to avoid argument
at
all costs speaks far more about your inability to put up than it does of 
anyones inability to argue against your mad assertions.

>> The lot of it.
>
> I didn't think so.

You have been accused of being a rabid, frothing, foaming anti-religious 
zealot so you are in no position to judge. Apart from that, what you think

is irrelevant. The only thing that counts here is that some also see that 
you are a rabid, frothing, foaming anti-religious zealot who harbours
bitter
hatred; or at least some come to suspect it.

> Actually it is sup****ted 100%...

But 0% by yourself. k0oKsign. "It's in the books! Read the books!"

> But you haven't studied history it seems you wouldn't even be asking
> questions.

More k0oKsign. That's three times so far that you have fallen back to
'read 
this, that and the other then you'll understand my argument.'

> No, I really don't have time to waste with someone that doesn't have
> any of the basic knowledge to begin with...

Assumptions will do you in every time. You know full well that I can, in
all
likelihood, tear your mad assertions down so it is no wonder that you are 
not prepared to rise to the challenge.

>> A) Always believe that only you know the TRVTH.
>
> No, I know I am not the only person that knows the Trvth. Hell I
> don't think the Trvth exists.

So then, sup****t your claim. In case you conveniently forget which claim
is 
being referenced, it's this one:

[QUOTE]
> The old church is the foundation which all the fundies beliefs
> are built upon.

I say you are a bare-faced, frothing liar. Sup****t your claim that
"The old church is the foundation which all the fundies beliefs are
built upon" with argument and/or evidence.
[/QUOTE]

>> B) Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
>
> It hasn't stopped you.

IKYABWAI. The first line of k0oK defences.

>> C) Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if
>> they approve the drivel you are writing!
>
> Who have I quoted beside went I suggested you take the time to read
> Calvin's writings...  Prior to studying about the era of 325 and
> event leading up to and following the Council of Nicene

bluh bluh. Does that gibberish of yours make sense to you?

All I can get out of it is 'go and read this, that and the other'. Oh, and

the false assumption that I don't know anything about Calvin. So, what is
it
about Calvin's works that is relevant to your claims?

[Insert statement to the effect, 'read it for yourself and come to the
same 
conclusion I did', here]

>> D) Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the
>> more likely others will believe you!
>
> Not really I don't care one wit...

So, you don't care one wit but you will answer every one of the 10 or 11 
k0oKsigns levelled against you, yes?

> But liked I said education yourself.

Serious k0oKsign. Your failure to backup your claim is due to someone
else's
lack of education. BWAHAHAHAH! PMSL.

>> E) When responding to one line challenges, post paragraphs of rants
>> and screed in response.
>
> One just respond with one line taunts...

IKYABWAI.

>> F) Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting.
>
> I doesn't stop you does it.

IKYABWAI.

>> G) Neither is illiteracy.
>
> I guess you don't read much...

Bad guess.

>> H) Delusions poasted often enough become fact.
>
> I guess that is what you are shooting for.

Again, does that gibberish mean something to you or is that yet another 
IKYABWAI broadside? You know, the first refuge of the k0oK?

>> I) Always accuse others of the very acts you are guilty of.
>
> That what you entire article was about...

I have charged you with the net.crime of claiming others do what you do 
yourself.

>> hahaha.
>>
>> J) Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do
>> not require proof.
>
> While I don't have proof

You were not asked for proof, netk0oK. You were asked for, and I quote, 
"argument and/or evidence". None of which you have managed to provide.

> I can point to others work which sup****t my claims.

More k0oksign. Your statement means, in effect, "I believe everything I
read
on this subject and am not only incapable of making my own mind up, but I
am
also incapable of explaining why I believe these things."

>> haha.
>>
>> K) K00ks LOVE to "connect the dots". They are, of course, dots that
>> only the k00k can see.
>>
>> http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
>
> That looks like it was started from the old KOOK FAQ which Lou used
> to keep on his page.

Duh. Why do you suppose the source was credited?

>>>>> In this case, I will use a broad brush, if it suits me to make
>>>>> people think...
>>>>
>>>> You might not have caught the attention of my k0oK detector had you
>>>> thought before you frothed and foamed your rabid hatred all over
>>>> the place, Bob.
>>>
>>> Then your detector must be broken or it would be going off every
>>> time you walked into the room.
>>
>> Wow, Bob! An IKYABWAI lame. What next, 'your mother' lames?
>
> No, I'll leave that for you.

IKYABWAI.

>> I say you are showing the signs of being a rabid k0oK, no matter how
>> hard you try to ingratiate yourself with others.
>
> Can a laugh at you, now...

Laugh all you like. You can not and will not sup****t your claim so it's no

wonder that you want to engage laughter as a denial/coping mechanism; it 
goes quite well with your utter failure to put up apparently being due to
my
supposed lack of education.

-- 
DISCLAIMER: The content does not reflect the thoughts or opinions of
either 
my ISP, myself, my company or employer, my friends (if any,) my goldfish
or 
my neighbour's mad dog; don't quote me on that; don't quote me on
anything; 
all rights reserved; the post is distribution copyrighted to the extent
that
you may distribute the post and all its associated parts freely but you
may 
not make a profit from it or include the post in commercial publications 
without written permission from the Prime Minister of Hutt Province; other

copyright laws for specific posts apply wherever noted or not noted,
either 
deliberately, negligently, or otherwise; posts are subject to change
without
notice; posts are slightly enlarged to show detail; any resemblance to 
actual persons, living or dead, is unintentional and purely coincidental; 
hand wash only, tumble dry on low heat; do not bend, fold, mutilate, or 
spindle; do not pass go; do not collect $200; your mileage may vary; no 
substitutions allowed; for a limited time only; the post is void where 
prohibited, taxed, or otherwise restricted; the post is provided "as is" 
without any warranties expressed or implied; user assumes full
liabilities; 
not liable for damages due to use or misuse; an equal op****tunity abuse 
employer; no shoes, no ****rt; quantities are limited while supplies last;
if
defects are discovered, do not attempt to fix them yourself but return to
an
authorised post service centre; caveat emptor; read at your own risk; 
parental advisory - explicit words; text may contain material some readers

may find objectionable, parental guidance is advised; not suitable for 
children; not suitable for adults; not for human consumption; keep away
from
sunlight, pets and small children; limit one-per-family; no money down; no

purchase necessary; to approved purchasers only; facsimiles are acceptable

in South Australia; you need not be present to read this post; some
assembly
required; batteries not included; action figures sold separately; no 
preservatives added; tools not included; safety goggles may be required 
during use; sealed for your protection, do not use if the safety seal is 
broken; call before you dig; for external use only; if a rash, redness, 
irritation or swelling develops, discontinue use; use only with proper 
ventilation; avoid extreme temperatures and store in a cool, dry place;
keep
away from open flames, ****d flames and old flames; avoid inhaling fumes; 
avoid contact with mucous membranes; do not puncture, incinerate, or store

above 60 degrees Centigrade; do not place near flammable or magnetic
source;
smoking the post may be hazardous to your health; the best safeguard,
second
only to abstinence, is the use of a good laugh; text used on the post is 
made from 100% recycled electrons and magnetic particles; no animals were 
used to test the hilarity of this post other than Synapse Syndrome; no
salt,
MSG, artificial colour or flavour added; may contain traces of replies to 
peanuts; if ingested, do not induce vomiting, if symptoms persist, consult

your humourologist; post is ribbed for your pleasure; slippery when wet; 
must be 18 to read; possible penalties for early withdrawal; post offer 
valid only in participating newsgroups; slightly higher in South
Australia; 
allow four to six weeks for delivery; damage from hurricane, lightning, 
tornado, tsunami, volcanic eruption, earthquake, flood, orgasm, misuse, 
self-abuse, neglect, unauthorised repair, damage from improper
installation,
broken antenna, marred cabinet, incorrect line voltage, missing or altered

serial numbers, sonic boom vibrations, electromagnetic radiation from 
nuclear blasts or other Acts of God are not covered; incidents owing to 
aeroplane crash, ****p sinking, motor vehicle accidents, leaky roof, broken

glass, falling rocks, mud slides, forest fire, flying projectiles or 
dropping the item are also excluded; other restrictions may apply. If 
something offends you, lighten up, get a life, and move on. All conditions

apply. Not available in all stores. Facts have been changed to protect the

guilty.

Hdpnkuhqhryhwjupmnhzjy,dhuhkyphnhdkmnycdhq.Kmzzhzhrycwjnojycjydhq,djmy
Uxyzotvvtpctmmrnr,jzjtmipuux,jpnxwhxmhxfretx,bptuphzm.

Bzpvuzoznrvz
 




 53 Posts in Topic:
NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Daedalus <jade@[EMAIL   2005-10-27 15:23:03 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL   2005-10-27 17:27:59 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Chris Krolczyk"  2005-10-27 16:48:39 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Art Deco <art_deco@[EM  2005-10-28 07:52:47 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
John Henry <jhd@[EMAIL  2005-10-28 18:03:52 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Lambdascorpii"  2005-10-29 09:21:27 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL   2005-10-29 10:45:17 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 10:11:04 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-29 14:08:41 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 14:35:36 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Kadaitcha Man"  2005-10-30 05:07:40 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 16:50:11 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Kadaitcha Man"  2005-10-30 05:48:57 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 17:27:15 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Kadaitcha Man"  2005-10-30 06:32:04 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 18:23:48 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Kadaitcha Man"  2005-10-30 08:10:17 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 21:02:07 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Kadaitcha Man"  2005-10-30 10:31:58 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 22:38:41 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Kadaitcha Man"  2005-10-30 11:39:31 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 23:37:25 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Kadaitcha Man"  2005-10-30 13:01:44 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-29 18:19:31 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 18:27:26 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-29 23:01:32 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-29 23:25:42 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Dr. Flonkenstein&qu  2005-10-30 08:10:24 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-30 10:17:44 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-30 12:13:10 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Dr. Flonkenstein&qu  2005-10-31 03:28:05 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-30 19:31:26 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-30 00:42:54 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-30 01:10:37 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-30 12:42:55 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-30 18:04:41 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-30 19:20:59 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Dr. Flonkenstein&qu  2005-10-31 06:27:40 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-30 23:18:32 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Dr. Flonkenstein&qu  2005-11-01 04:19:33 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-11-01 22:28:26 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-11-01 23:13:59 
Wollmannizer nocem 04397 @@NCM
Wollmannizer NOCEM <wo  2005-11-02 09:58:24 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bob Officer <boboffice  2005-10-30 23:37:05 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
"Kadaitcha Man"  2005-10-31 13:33:37 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
<yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL P  2005-10-31 01:01:30 
Wollmannizer nocem 04387 @@NCM
Wollmannizer NOCEM <wo  2005-10-31 06:19:34 
Zing the yyyiiinnnggg nocem 04367 @@NCM
Wollmannizer NOCEM <wo  2005-10-30 00:21:48 
Zing the yyyiiinnnggg nocem 04368 @@NCM
Wollmannizer NOCEM <wo  2005-10-30 12:43:35 
Zing the Yyyiiinnnggg nocem 04366 @@NCM
Wollmannizer NOCEM <wo  2005-10-29 14:08:41 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Daedalus <jade@[EMAIL   2005-11-01 12:35:42 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
AmyFisher@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2005-11-02 20:40:17 
Re: NO ONE WILL PREDICT THE DEATH OF MOHAMMED ALI
Bushistas Support Fascist  2005-11-03 05:03:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 10:02:38 CST 2008.