On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:31:58 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha Man"
<nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the deathlike, dented fast-food
>restaurant worker, and hedger and ditcher, ejected:
>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:10:17 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
>> Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>> http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
>>>>
>>>> That looks like it was started from the old KOOK FAQ which Lou used
>>>> to keep on his page.
>>>
>>> Duh. Why do you suppose the source was credited?
>>
>> Then you should take a long careful look...
>> I helped write that source...
>
>Really? It only credits "Aratzio, Dr. Flonkenstein, Dan Baldwin, Cujo, CJ
>Osterwald, Jade, Bookman, and John Henry". You should protest loudly.
If that was based upon the Kook FAQ, kept by Lou, Then I did... check with
Cujo he was around back then... Why protest something that was written
years ago, no deal. I don't see Lou is given any credit either, Or many of
the other people that contributed to it either.
>> Now, go pound sand, chump.
>
>Oooooh. Tough. Scawy, even. Is that why you snecked all the argument and
>charges against you, chicken**** k0oK? Trim, snip, hack, avoid and run
away
>from it all you like; you're only providing empirical evidence to sup****t
>what's already been written about you; that you believe everything you
read
>on this subject and are not only incapable of making your own mind up,
but
>are also incapable of explaining why you believe the things you proclaim.
>Not much different to Alexa and free electricity from aluminium, eh.
Because I can.
>The only suprising thing is that you got away with hiding your rabid,
>anti-religious zealot personality for so long.
>
>End of exposé.
No exposé, chump...
|
