On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:39:31 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha Man"
<nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the livid, fungus-covered sucker,
>and horse manure collector, disclosed:
>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:31:58 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
>> Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Officer, <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the deathlike, dented
>>> fast-food restaurant worker, and hedger and ditcher, ejected:
>>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:10:17 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
>>>> Man" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That looks like it was started from the old KOOK FAQ which Lou
>>>>>> used to keep on his page.
>>>>>
>>>>> Duh. Why do you suppose the source was credited?
>>>>
>>>> Then you should take a long careful look...
>>>> I helped write that source...
>>>
>>> Really? It only credits "Aratzio, Dr. Flonkenstein, Dan Baldwin,
>>> Cujo, CJ Osterwald, Jade, Bookman, and John Henry". You should
>>> protest loudly.
>>
>> If that was based upon the Kook FAQ
>
>You mean you don't know? BWAHAHAHHAHAAH! First you claim you 'helped
write
>that source' then you lay down a get out clause. You're pathetic.
Really, I don't think so? I have seen dozens of posts with your pointless
rants and raves.. I think you are a foam speckled kook that wandering from
someplace else..
>>, kept by Lou, Then I did... check
>> with Cujo he was around back then...
>
>You check with Cujo, you ****ing gormless snotbag. You are the one who is
in
>doubt and I simply don't care. What the **** do you want? You want me to
>write a post titled "PING > Cujo"... "Hey, Cujo, did that gasbag k0oK Bob
>Officer have anything to do with writing..."
Geeze, since that web site give credit to Cujo and Dan Baldwin... and I
know
Cujo was around when Lou wrote his Kook FAQ over in alt.paranormal. The
rest
of those names are fairly new in comparison.
>You're acting just like the corneded k0oK that you are, you freaking
weasel.
and you are acting like bRay Kazoo of Kettler...
>> Why protest something that was
>> written years ago, no deal.
>
>You simpering caricature of a slapped out *****. If it means so little to
>you, why bring it up in the first place? Hmmm?
Because you Half wit moron I have been around here far long than you.
Now be a nice little kook and **** off.
>> I don't see Lou is given any credit
>> either, Or many of the other people that contributed to it either.
>
>You're also rambling.
You're welcome to your opinion..
>>>> Now, go pound sand, chump.
>>>
>>> Oooooh. Tough. Scawy, even. Is that why you snecked all the argument
>>> and charges against you, chicken**** k0oK? Trim, snip, hack, avoid
>>> and run away from it all you like; you're only providing empirical
>>> evidence to sup****t what's already been written about you; that you
>>> believe everything you read on this subject and are not only
>>> incapable of making your own mind up, but are also incapable of
>>> explaining why you believe the things you proclaim. Not much
>>> different to Alexa and free electricity from aluminium, eh.
>>
>> Because I can.
>
>Of course you can run away, but that doesn't get rid of what is already
>written, you whacking great fruitcake.
you are nasty tonight... maybe David has a point. you seem to take this as
it is personal or im****tant.
>>> The only suprising thing is that you got away with hiding your rabid,
>>> anti-religious zealot personality for so long.
>>> End of exposé.
>>
>> No exposé, chump...
>
>Ooooh. Scathing. That's twice you've used the word chump in two
consecutive
>posts. Reached the limit of your vocabulary, have you?
That because you are one...
Chump...
A foam speckled... chump.
|
