"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:5kp8m1tkan1dj8ap7c5ote935ojtloiaic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:01:32 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:a888m1dl9ljnqdldgj7dhn4r7nd4f2ot9q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:19:31 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:55q7m1p4ctm4vrc86kgqigcl7s83tc9t75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:08:41 -0700, in alt.astrology,
>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:77b7m11d7rauhqa9ncgfkbcgjkh46pv5j3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:45:17 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>> "KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:21:27 -0400, "Lambdascorpii"
>>>>>>>><lambdascorpii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I don't give a ****...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Uh....Then why did you post a reply to a message subject that you
>>>>>>>>don't care about.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Seems kinda silly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He believes in astrology...
>>>>>>> that sort of fits the mold
>>>>>>> Which He has built for himself
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Do you think astrology doesn't work?
>>>>>
>>>>> I know it doesn't work. just like magic doesn't work, the bread
>>>>> doesn't
>>>>> really turn into meat, and the wine doesn't really turn into blood
in
>>>>> the
>>>>> rite of ritual canabilism/vampirism practiced in most christian
>>>>> churches.
>>>>>
>>>>> Magic doesn't exist, their are no fairies, aliens in UFOs, LGMs,
gods
>>>>> or
>>>>> goddesses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Astrology, the superstition is based on Apophenia... It is an
artifact
>>>>> of
>>>>> the way the human brain works. The human brain tries to make
patterned
>>>>> where
>>>>> they are no pattern. Also if you are into ready, study what a type
one
>>>>> statistical error is. The best pro astrology arguments to come up in
>>>>> years
>>>>> was based upon the so called mars effect, which was accomplished by
>>>>> the
>>>>> cherry picking of data. When the so called mars effect is looked at
in
>>>>> the
>>>>> general population, the tendency disappears. Just as every over so
>>>>> called
>>>>> astrological trait, disappears or appears uniformally in every sign,
>>>>> with
>>>>> an
>>>>> equal or nearly equal distribution.
>>>>>
>>>>> In others words, astrology is a superstition, based on the ancient
art
>>>>> of
>>>>> calendar keeping by a small religious body, based in the middle east
>>>>> about
>>>>> or before 3400 BC., a modern belief not based in facts or science,
but
>>>>> in
>>>>> disproved facts and a belief in idle speculation.
>>>>
>>>>Why do people exhibit patterns that are consistent with their
>>>>astrological
>>>>signs. For example, virgo are mostly liar/inflaters, and all aires are
>>>>managerial and calculating?
>>>
>>> I don't know...
>>> I find there are liar/inflaters in all groups , just as there are
>>> excellent
>>> managers in all groups, they are not concentrated in any one sign...
>>
>>Each sign has a set of predictable behavior patterns.
>>
>
> No they don't... the is a myth.
> Science and Math shows us those traits are equally distributed in all
the
> signs.
Do you have proof?
>
> The false pattern is called apophenia. It is an artifact of way the
human
> mind works. There is no traits which are unique to any astrological sign
> or
> combination of planetary aspects.
If you change the names of the signs, the relation between the signs
remains. There is nature in the patterns.
>
> Even Edmond Wollmann, a professional astrologer, says "a chart is no
more
> than a prop." Now I hate to use that s*** as an authority but hell you
> take
> your proof where ever you can find it.
>
>
|
