On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:20:59 -0800, yyyiiinnngg wrote:
>
> "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:vmuam1lbpp4u7jt69dglktnnv4nk2n6c48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:42:55 -0800, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:a7v8m1h4o6kpodsi2hao5bj12mortba9uu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 00:42:54 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>news:5kp8m1tkan1dj8ap7c5ote935ojtloiaic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:01:32 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:a888m1dl9ljnqdldgj7dhn4r7nd4f2ot9q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:19:31 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:55q7m1p4ctm4vrc86kgqigcl7s83tc9t75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:08:41 -0700, in alt.astrology,
>>>>>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>news:77b7m11d7rauhqa9ncgfkbcgjkh46pv5j3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:45:17 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> "KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:21:27 -0400, "Lambdascorpii"
>>>>>>>>>>>>><lambdascorpii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I don't give a ****...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Uh....Then why did you post a reply to a message subject that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>don't care about.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Seems kinda silly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He believes in astrology...
>>>>>>>>>>>> that sort of fits the mold
>>>>>>>>>>>> Which He has built for himself
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Do you think astrology doesn't work?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know it doesn't work. just like magic doesn't work, the bread
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> really turn into meat, and the wine doesn't really turn into
>>>>>>>>>> blood in
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> rite of ritual canabilism/vampirism practiced in most christian
>>>>>>>>>> churches.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Magic doesn't exist, their are no fairies, aliens in UFOs,
LGMs,
>>>>>>>>>> gods
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> goddesses.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Astrology, the superstition is based on Apophenia... It is an
>>>>>>>>>> artifact
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> the way the human brain works. The human brain tries to make
>>>>>>>>>> patterned
>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>> they are no pattern. Also if you are into ready, study what a
>>>>>>>>>> type one
>>>>>>>>>> statistical error is. The best pro astrology arguments to come
>>>>>>>>>> up in
>>>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>>>> was based upon the so called mars effect, which was
accomplished
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> cherry picking of data. When the so called mars effect is
looked
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> general population, the tendency disappears. Just as every over
>>>>>>>>>> so called
>>>>>>>>>> astrological trait, disappears or appears uniformally in every
>>>>>>>>>> sign,
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>> equal or nearly equal distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In others words, astrology is a superstition, based on the
>>>>>>>>>> ancient art
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> calendar keeping by a small religious body, based in the middle
>>>>>>>>>> east
>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>> or before 3400 BC., a modern belief not based in facts or
>>>>>>>>>> science, but
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> disproved facts and a belief in idle speculation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why do people exhibit patterns that are consistent with their
>>>>>>>>>astrological
>>>>>>>>>signs. For example, virgo are mostly liar/inflaters, and all
aires
>>>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>managerial and calculating?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't know...
>>>>>>>> I find there are liar/inflaters in all groups , just as there are
>>>>>>>> excellent
>>>>>>>> managers in all groups, they are not concentrated in any one
>>>>>>>> sign...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Each sign has a set of predictable behavior patterns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No they don't... the is a myth.
>>>>>> Science and Math shows us those traits are equally distributed in
>>>>>> all the
>>>>>> signs.
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you have proof?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I do...
>>>> It get posted about once or twice a year to alt.astrology. see the
>>>> links I have provided below.
>>>
>>>Is that how you prove anything mathematically?
>>
>> The math is shown the links. I not going to tie up bandwidth with
copies
>> of
>> other articles. Follow the links below. Did you even look at them.
>> Several of them follow Dean's twin study, the study of birthday twins.
>
> Mathematically, you only need one example to prove that something
exists.
> There is never enough evidence to prove that something doesn't exit.
Hey, fish, don't talk math if you even arn't able to count:
"There is no number that is bigger than any other number". This is a
statement that explicitely states something doesn't exist. Yet the proof
of this statment is elementary, except for fish, of course, because they
can't count.
> Assuming your links are all correct, that doesn't mean astrology doesn't
> exist. Do you follow?
>
Of course it exists. In the mind of people who substitute their wishful
thinking for where their clear critical mind would be.
>
>> Both of them show no astrological traits
>>
>>>>>> The false pattern is called apophenia. It is an artifact of way the
>>>>>> human
>>>>>> mind works. There is no traits which are unique to any astrological
>>>>>> sign
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> combination of planetary aspects.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you change the names of the signs, the relation between the signs
>>>>>remains. There is nature in the patterns.
>>>>
>>>> No, there isn't.
>>>> That is entirely false.
>>>> There is no pattern
>>>>
>>>> Start here:
>>>> http://skepdic.com/astrolgy.html
>>>> http://skepdic.com/coldread.html
>>>>
>>>> and follow the links
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pac-c.org/astrology2.htm
>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/astrology.html
>>>> http://aries.phys.yorku.ca/~mmdr/1800/astrology-faq-synopsis.html
>>>> http://skepdic.com/essays/jones.html
>>>> http://www.imprint.co.uk/pdf/Dean.pdf
>>>>
http://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/home/ertel/ertel-dir/downloads/geffectsbroughtdown.pdf
>>>> http://www.gwup.org/themen/lesetipps/michaelshermersencyclopedia.html
>>>>
>>>> That should get you started...
>>
>> I don't think she even read as far as the links.
>>
>>>>>> Even Edmond Wollmann, a professional astrologer, says "a chart is
no
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> than a prop." Now I hate to use that s*** as an authority but hell
>>>>>> you take your proof where ever you can find it.
>>
>>
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
in Message-ID:<adurg15tk0vd6ip6r1lh297cequd35addb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Alexa "Crackpot" Cameron explains electromagnetism, and how
the sun has an 'iron core':
"The sun and the earth are 'magnets', each with an iron
based core, and both have an electrical force between them."
in Message-ID: <rjise19nrclufrgjg5ragcpbbihn3coliv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mark "Woody" Ferguson shows his mastery of the English language:
"With patients and practice you could be nominated next time around..."
in Message-MID: <k1kte1hu59khhkt4m1g42g52gkacmcokin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mark "The illiterate" Ferguson astonishes everybody saying:
"Oh, for ****s sake, Gary no matter how angery he thinks he makes there
are lines I will not cross unless I believe what I say is the true, I
know more then you."
in Message-ID: <lhic01pc5svudk22n6rpcvovskdmpi3ir8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
"The jews roots are islamic."
in Message-ID: <j1b5c1l2629tc6afu575d5puclm321knok@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
"WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."
in Message-ID: <5g89d15kbjd3cd7i6fn9c3ke93n12dm406@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
"Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral'
triangle."
in Message-ID: <1rfee1d5iuhq3piii8b9dtq9rtk5uatr1h@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Alexa "Kook of the year 2004" Cameron uses words she doesn't understand
again:
"Why is the Pentagon killing American citizens with non-lethal
technology?"
in Message-ID: <2mrge1phgk68ourdt2eq8thne0h7hv0sb6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Alexa "Imnotalexadammit" Cameron has problems with that extra finger
on her hand:
"Why do the Jews use the Star of David as symbolic of the Pentagon, or
Pentagram?"
reminder: Message-ID:
<pan.2005.09.01.00.52.15.77207@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
The quote naziwhore Don Ocean stole.
|
