"Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.10.31.05.27.31.200808@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:20:59 -0800, yyyiiinnngg wrote:
>
>>
>> "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:vmuam1lbpp4u7jt69dglktnnv4nk2n6c48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:42:55 -0800, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:a7v8m1h4o6kpodsi2hao5bj12mortba9uu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 00:42:54 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:5kp8m1tkan1dj8ap7c5ote935ojtloiaic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:01:32 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:a888m1dl9ljnqdldgj7dhn4r7nd4f2ot9q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:19:31 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>news:55q7m1p4ctm4vrc86kgqigcl7s83tc9t75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:08:41 -0700, in alt.astrology,
>>>>>>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>news:77b7m11d7rauhqa9ncgfkbcgjkh46pv5j3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:45:17 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:21:27 -0400, "Lambdascorpii"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lambdascorpii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I don't give a ****...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Uh....Then why did you post a reply to a message subject
that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>don't care about.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Seems kinda silly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He believes in astrology...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that sort of fits the mold
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which He has built for himself
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Do you think astrology doesn't work?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I know it doesn't work. just like magic doesn't work, the
bread
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> really turn into meat, and the wine doesn't really turn into
>>>>>>>>>>> blood in
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> rite of ritual canabilism/vampirism practiced in most
christian
>>>>>>>>>>> churches.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Magic doesn't exist, their are no fairies, aliens in UFOs,
LGMs,
>>>>>>>>>>> gods
>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>> goddesses.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Astrology, the superstition is based on Apophenia... It is an
>>>>>>>>>>> artifact
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> the way the human brain works. The human brain tries to make
>>>>>>>>>>> patterned
>>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>>> they are no pattern. Also if you are into ready, study what a
>>>>>>>>>>> type one
>>>>>>>>>>> statistical error is. The best pro astrology arguments to come
>>>>>>>>>>> up in
>>>>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>>>>> was based upon the so called mars effect, which was
accomplished
>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> cherry picking of data. When the so called mars effect is
looked
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> general population, the tendency disappears. Just as every
over
>>>>>>>>>>> so called
>>>>>>>>>>> astrological trait, disappears or appears uniformally in every
>>>>>>>>>>> sign,
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> equal or nearly equal distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In others words, astrology is a superstition, based on the
>>>>>>>>>>> ancient art
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> calendar keeping by a small religious body, based in the
middle
>>>>>>>>>>> east
>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> or before 3400 BC., a modern belief not based in facts or
>>>>>>>>>>> science, but
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> disproved facts and a belief in idle speculation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why do people exhibit patterns that are consistent with their
>>>>>>>>>>astrological
>>>>>>>>>>signs. For example, virgo are mostly liar/inflaters, and all
aires
>>>>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>managerial and calculating?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know...
>>>>>>>>> I find there are liar/inflaters in all groups , just as there
are
>>>>>>>>> excellent
>>>>>>>>> managers in all groups, they are not concentrated in any one
>>>>>>>>> sign...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Each sign has a set of predictable behavior patterns.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No they don't... the is a myth.
>>>>>>> Science and Math shows us those traits are equally distributed in
>>>>>>> all the
>>>>>>> signs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Do you have proof?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I do...
>>>>> It get posted about once or twice a year to alt.astrology. see the
>>>>> links I have provided below.
>>>>
>>>>Is that how you prove anything mathematically?
>>>
>>> The math is shown the links. I not going to tie up bandwidth with
copies
>>> of
>>> other articles. Follow the links below. Did you even look at them.
>>> Several of them follow Dean's twin study, the study of birthday twins.
>>
>> Mathematically, you only need one example to prove that something
exists.
>> There is never enough evidence to prove that something doesn't exit.
>
> Hey, fish, don't talk math if you even arn't able to count:
Do I have prove you everything? YOu are the fish. That has been
established.
>
> "There is no number that is bigger than any other number". This is a
> statement that explicitely states something doesn't exist.
Fish head, what's really in your jello. Your statement is like "The one
with
biggest number, if you are here, please you raise your hand!" If you can't
appoint an number that's possibly the grestest, you still don't know how
great other numbers can be.
>Yet the proof
> of this statment is elementary, except for fish, of course, because they
> can't count.
In attempts to prove that you are not so much more stupid, you tried
proving
astrology doesn't exist. Your statement is like "If we can not prove that
you exist, then you don't exist. And **** off, the non-existent."
>
>
>> Assuming your links are all correct, that doesn't mean astrology
doesn't
>> exist. Do you follow?
>>
> Of course it exists. In the mind of people who substitute their wishful
> thinking for where their clear critical mind would be.
Do you always explain your logic flaws with an ignorant statement?
>
>>
>>> Both of them show no astrological traits
>>>
>>>>>>> The false pattern is called apophenia. It is an artifact of way
the
>>>>>>> human
>>>>>>> mind works. There is no traits which are unique to any
astrological
>>>>>>> sign
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> combination of planetary aspects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you change the names of the signs, the relation between the signs
>>>>>>remains. There is nature in the patterns.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, there isn't.
>>>>> That is entirely false.
>>>>> There is no pattern
>>>>>
>>>>> Start here:
>>>>> http://skepdic.com/astrolgy.html
>>>>> http://skepdic.com/coldread.html
>>>>>
>>>>> and follow the links
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pac-c.org/astrology2.htm
>>>>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/astrology.html
>>>>> http://aries.phys.yorku.ca/~mmdr/1800/astrology-faq-synopsis.html
>>>>> http://skepdic.com/essays/jones.html
>>>>> http://www.imprint.co.uk/pdf/Dean.pdf
>>>>>
http://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/home/ertel/ertel-dir/downloads/geffectsbroughtdown.pdf
>>>>>
http://www.gwup.org/themen/lesetipps/michaelshermersencyclopedia.html
>>>>>
>>>>> That should get you started...
>>>
>>> I don't think she even read as far as the links.
>>>
>>>>>>> Even Edmond Wollmann, a professional astrologer, says "a chart is
no
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> than a prop." Now I hate to use that s*** as an authority but hell
>>>>>>> you take your proof where ever you can find it.
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> mhm 27x12
> smeeter #28
> Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
> Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
>
> The Way of the Kook:
> http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
>
> in Message-ID:<adurg15tk0vd6ip6r1lh297cequd35addb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Alexa "Crackpot" Cameron explains electromagnetism, and how
> the sun has an 'iron core':
> "The sun and the earth are 'magnets', each with an iron
> based core, and both have an electrical force between them."
>
> in Message-ID: <rjise19nrclufrgjg5ragcpbbihn3coliv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Mark "Woody" Ferguson shows his mastery of the English language:
> "With patients and practice you could be nominated next time around..."
>
> in Message-MID: <k1kte1hu59khhkt4m1g42g52gkacmcokin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Mark "The illiterate" Ferguson astonishes everybody saying:
> "Oh, for ****s sake, Gary no matter how angery he thinks he makes there
> are lines I will not cross unless I believe what I say is the true, I
> know more then you."
>
> in Message-ID: <lhic01pc5svudk22n6rpcvovskdmpi3ir8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
> "The jews roots are islamic."
>
> in Message-ID: <j1b5c1l2629tc6afu575d5puclm321knok@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
> "WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."
>
> in Message-ID: <5g89d15kbjd3cd7i6fn9c3ke93n12dm406@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
> "Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral'
> triangle."
>
> in Message-ID: <1rfee1d5iuhq3piii8b9dtq9rtk5uatr1h@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Alexa "Kook of the year 2004" Cameron uses words she doesn't understand
> again:
> "Why is the Pentagon killing American citizens with non-lethal
> technology?"
>
> in Message-ID: <2mrge1phgk68ourdt2eq8thne0h7hv0sb6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Alexa "Imnotalexadammit" Cameron has problems with that extra finger
> on her hand:
> "Why do the Jews use the Star of David as symbolic of the Pentagon, or
> Pentagram?"
>
> reminder: Message-ID:
> <pan.2005.09.01.00.52.15.77207@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The quote naziwhore Don Ocean stole.
>
>
|
