On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:27:40 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
<admin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:20:59 -0800, yyyiiinnngg wrote:
>
>>
>> "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:vmuam1lbpp4u7jt69dglktnnv4nk2n6c48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:42:55 -0800, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:a7v8m1h4o6kpodsi2hao5bj12mortba9uu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 00:42:54 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:5kp8m1tkan1dj8ap7c5ote935ojtloiaic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:01:32 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:a888m1dl9ljnqdldgj7dhn4r7nd4f2ot9q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:19:31 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>news:55q7m1p4ctm4vrc86kgqigcl7s83tc9t75@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:08:41 -0700, in alt.astrology,
>>>>>>>>>>> <yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>news:77b7m11d7rauhqa9ncgfkbcgjkh46pv5j3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:45:17 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <KOTY=DNC_TN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:21:27 -0400, "Lambdascorpii"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lambdascorpii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I don't give a ****...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Uh....Then why did you post a reply to a message subject
that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>don't care about.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Seems kinda silly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He believes in astrology...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that sort of fits the mold
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which He has built for himself
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Do you think astrology doesn't work?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I know it doesn't work. just like magic doesn't work, the
bread
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> really turn into meat, and the wine doesn't really turn into
>>>>>>>>>>> blood in
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> rite of ritual canabilism/vampirism practiced in most
christian
>>>>>>>>>>> churches.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Magic doesn't exist, their are no fairies, aliens in UFOs,
LGMs,
>>>>>>>>>>> gods
>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>> goddesses.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Astrology, the superstition is based on Apophenia... It is an
>>>>>>>>>>> artifact
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> the way the human brain works. The human brain tries to make
>>>>>>>>>>> patterned
>>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>>> they are no pattern. Also if you are into ready, study what a
>>>>>>>>>>> type one
>>>>>>>>>>> statistical error is. The best pro astrology arguments to come
>>>>>>>>>>> up in
>>>>>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>>>>>> was based upon the so called mars effect, which was
accomplished
>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> cherry picking of data. When the so called mars effect is
looked
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> general population, the tendency disappears. Just as every
over
>>>>>>>>>>> so called
>>>>>>>>>>> astrological trait, disappears or appears uniformally in every
>>>>>>>>>>> sign,
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> equal or nearly equal distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In others words, astrology is a superstition, based on the
>>>>>>>>>>> ancient art
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> calendar keeping by a small religious body, based in the
middle
>>>>>>>>>>> east
>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> or before 3400 BC., a modern belief not based in facts or
>>>>>>>>>>> science, but
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> disproved facts and a belief in idle speculation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why do people exhibit patterns that are consistent with their
>>>>>>>>>>astrological
>>>>>>>>>>signs. For example, virgo are mostly liar/inflaters, and all
aires
>>>>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>managerial and calculating?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know...
>>>>>>>>> I find there are liar/inflaters in all groups , just as there
are
>>>>>>>>> excellent
>>>>>>>>> managers in all groups, they are not concentrated in any one
>>>>>>>>> sign...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Each sign has a set of predictable behavior patterns.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No they don't... the is a myth.
>>>>>>> Science and Math shows us those traits are equally distributed in
>>>>>>> all the
>>>>>>> signs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Do you have proof?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I do...
>>>>> It get posted about once or twice a year to alt.astrology. see the
>>>>> links I have provided below.
>>>>
>>>>Is that how you prove anything mathematically?
>>>
>>> The math is shown the links. I not going to tie up bandwidth with
copies
>>> of
>>> other articles. Follow the links below. Did you even look at them.
>>> Several of them follow Dean's twin study, the study of birthday twins.
>>
>> Mathematically, you only need one example to prove that something
exists.
>> There is never enough evidence to prove that something doesn't exit.
>
>Hey, fish, don't talk math if you even arn't able to count:
>
>"There is no number that is bigger than any other number". This is a
>statement that explicitely states something doesn't exist. Yet the proof
>of this statment is elementary, except for fish, of course, because they
>can't count.
Howabout this one. Ying asks for evidence. when I post URLs which sup****t
my
claim, the ying says in message:Message-ID: <dk46a4$bh8$0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
"I don't click on links that are potentially malicious."
From know on when Ying asks for evidence, she will get that quote given
back
to her.
>> Assuming your links are all correct, that doesn't mean astrology
doesn't
>> exist. Do you follow?
>>
>Of course it exists. In the mind of people who substitute their wishful
>thinking for where their clear critical mind would be.
Astrology is basically wishful thinking and cold read. Did you know she
wanted to give a reading on me... :) And my data and history is scattered
around on the net were she could read it.
<snip of stuff ying neither read nor responded to>
|
